Analysis of strain and regional variation in gene expression in mouse brain

被引:214
作者
Pavlidis, Paul [1 ]
Noble, William S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Columbia Genome Ctr, 1150 St Nicholas Ave, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Dept Comp Sci, 1214 Amsterdam Ave, New York, NY 10027 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Feature Selection; Additional Data File; Entorhinal Cortex; Feature Selection Method; Template Match;
D O I
10.1186/gb-2001-2-10-research0042
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background: We performed a statistical analysis of a previously published set of gene expression microarray data from six different brain regions in two mouse strains. In the previous analysis, 24 genes showing expression differences between the strains and about 240 genes with regional differences in expression were identified. Like many gene expression studies, that analysis relied primarily on ad hoc `fold change' and `absent/present' criteria to select genes. To determine whether statistically motivated methods would give a more sensitive and selective analysis of gene expression patterns in the brain, we decided to use analysis of variance (ANOVA) and feature selection methods designed to select genes showing strain- or region-dependent patterns of expression. Results: Our analysis revealed many additional genes that might be involved in behavioral differences between the two mouse strains and functional differences between the six brain regions. Using conservative statistical criteria, we identified at least 63 genes showing strain variation and approximately 600 genes showing regional variation. Unlike ad hoc methods, ours have the additional benefit of ranking the genes by statistical score, permitting further analysis to focus on the most significant. Comparison of our results to the previous studies and to published reports on individual genes show that we achieved high sensitivity while preserving selectivity. Conclusions: Our results indicate that molecular differences between the strains and regions studied are larger than indicated previously. We conclude that for large complex datasets, ANOVA and feature selection, alone or in combination, are more powerful than methods based on fold-change thresholds and other ad hoc selection criteria.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, ANAL VARIANCE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Resampling-based multiple testing: Examples and methods for P-value adjustment
[3]   Microarray expression profiling identifies genes with altered expression in HDL-deficient mice [J].
Callow, MJ ;
Dudoit, S ;
Gong, EL ;
Speed, TP ;
Rubin, EM .
GENOME RESEARCH, 2000, 10 (12) :2022-2029
[4]  
CHEN ZL, 1995, J NEUROSCI, V15, P5088
[5]   The transcriptional program of sporulation in budding yeast [J].
Chu, S ;
DeRisi, J ;
Eisen, M ;
Mulholland, J ;
Botstein, D ;
Brown, PO ;
Herskowitz, I .
SCIENCE, 1998, 282 (5389) :699-705
[6]   Behavioral phenotypes of inbred mouse strains: implications and recommendations for molecular studies [J].
Crawley, JN ;
Belknap, JK ;
Collins, A ;
Crabbe, JC ;
Frankel, W ;
Henderson, N ;
Hitzemann, RJ ;
Maxson, SC ;
Miner, LL ;
Silva, AJ ;
Wehner, JM ;
WynshawBoris, A ;
Paylor, R .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1997, 132 (02) :107-124
[7]  
Efron B., 2000, MICROARRAYS THEIR US
[8]   Characterization of neuropeptide YY1-like and Y2-like receptor subtypes in the mouse brain [J].
Gackenheimer, SL ;
Schober, DA ;
Gehlert, DR .
PEPTIDES, 2001, 22 (03) :335-341
[9]   Mice, microarrays, and the genetic diversity of the brain [J].
Geschwind, DH .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2000, 97 (20) :10676-10678
[10]   Molecular classification of cancer: Class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring [J].
Golub, TR ;
Slonim, DK ;
Tamayo, P ;
Huard, C ;
Gaasenbeek, M ;
Mesirov, JP ;
Coller, H ;
Loh, ML ;
Downing, JR ;
Caligiuri, MA ;
Bloomfield, CD ;
Lander, ES .
SCIENCE, 1999, 286 (5439) :531-537