Implementation of laparoscopic colectomy with fast-track care in an academic medical center: benefits of a fully ascended learning curve and specialty expertise

被引:36
作者
Bosio, Raul M. [1 ]
Smith, Bryan M. [1 ]
Aybar, Pablo Serrano [1 ]
Senagore, Anthony J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toledo, Dept Surg, Toledo, OH 43614 USA
关键词
Laparoscopic colectomy; length of stay; cost analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.09.019
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There are few data describing successful institutional "conversion" from open colectomy/standard care techniques to laparoscopic colectomy/fast-track care. Purpose: To assess the benefits of transitioning an institution from open to laparoscopic colectomy with fast-track care while avoiding a learning curve. Method: Twenty consecutive laparoscopic colorectal resections (LCRs) performed by a colorectal surgeon were compared with 20 matched open colorectal resections (OCRs) performed by general surgeons before the arrival of the colorectal surgeon. Results: Surgical procedures were as follows: sigmoidectomy: OCR 16 and LCR 11; right colectomy: OCR 3 and LCR 8; and total colectomy: OCR 1 and LCR 1. The mean operative time for sigmoidectomy was 250 and 109 minutes for OCR and LCR, respectively, and for right colectomy 181 and 97 minutes for OCR and LCR, respectively (P < .001). Morbidity was OCR 45% versus LCR 25%. There was no mortality. LCR showed significantly lower length of stay and direct cost (3.6 vs. 8.3 days; $4,993 vs. $11,383; both P < .001.). Conclusions: The data clearly show an institutional benefit for the implementation of specialty-based advanced laparoscopic procedures. (c) 2007 Excerpta Medica Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 415
页数:3
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Implementation of a clinical pathway decreases length of stay and hospital charges for patients undergoing total colectomy and ileal pouch anal anastomosis [J].
Archer, SB ;
Burnett, RJ ;
Flesch, LV ;
Hobler, SC ;
Bower, RH ;
Nussbaum, MS ;
Fischer, JE .
SURGERY, 1997, 122 (04) :699-703
[2]   The impact of a laparoscopic colorectal surgeon on the laparoscopic colectomy experience of a single academic center [J].
Austin, MT ;
Feurer, ID ;
Holzman, MD ;
Richards, WO ;
Pinson, CW ;
Herline, AJ .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2005, 19 (03) :311-315
[3]   Functional recovery after open versus laparoscopic colonic resection - A randomized, blinded study [J].
Basse, L ;
Jakobsen, DH ;
Bardram, L ;
Billesbolle, P ;
Lund, C ;
Mogensen, T ;
Rosenberg, J ;
Kehlet, H .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2005, 241 (03) :416-423
[4]   A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection [J].
Basse, L ;
Jakobsen, DH ;
Billesbolle, P ;
Werner, M ;
Kehlet, H .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2000, 232 (01) :51-57
[5]   Prospective randomized trial of early initiation and hospital discharge on a liquid diet following elective intestinal surgery [J].
Behrns, KE ;
Kircher, AP ;
Galanko, JA ;
Brownstein, MR ;
Koruda, MJ .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2000, 4 (02) :217-221
[6]  
Bennett CL, 1997, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V132, P41
[7]   Immediately recognizable benefits and drawbacks after laparoscopic colon resection for benign disease [J].
Bergamaschi, R ;
Arnaud, JP .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1997, 11 (08) :802-804
[8]   MUST EARLY POSTOPERATIVE ORAL INTAKE BE LIMITED TO LAPAROSCOPY [J].
BINDEROW, SR ;
COHEN, SM ;
WEXNER, SD ;
NOGUERAS, JJ .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1994, 37 (06) :584-589
[9]  
Bloomston Mark, 2005, J Natl Compr Canc Netw, V3, P517
[10]   Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer:: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial [J].
Bonjer, HJ ;
Haglind, E ;
Jeekel, I ;
Kazemier, G ;
Páhlman, L ;
Hop, WCJ ;
Veldkamp, R ;
Kuhry, E ;
Haglind, E ;
Pahlman, L ;
Cuesta, MA ;
Msika, S ;
Morino, M ;
Lacy, A ;
Jeekel, I .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2005, 6 (07) :477-484