Factors influencing delivery method in breech presentation

被引:14
作者
Albrechtsen, S [1 ]
Rasmussen, S
Dalaker, K
Irgens, LM
机构
[1] Haukeland Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, N-5021 Bergen, Norway
[2] Univ Bergen, Med Birth Registry Norway, N-5020 Bergen, Norway
[3] Aker Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Oslo, Norway
关键词
breech presentation; delivery method; maternity institution; municipality index;
D O I
10.1034/j.1600-0412.1998.770410.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background. To study factors influencing delivery method in breech presentation. Methods. Population based cohort study from The Medical Birth Registry of Norway, comprising all singleton deliveries in Norway, 1967-1994, 1,592,064 deliveries of which 45,921 (2.9%) were in breech presentation. Results. The proportion of cesarean section in breech presentation increased from 3.6 per 100 in 1969 to 58.8 in 1994. The relative risk for delivery by cesarean section in breech presentation compared to the nonbreech population increased from 2.0 (95% CI 1.5-2.7) in 1967 to 5.9 (95% CI 5.6-6.2) in 1994. It declined by maternal age, increased by gestational age and was lowest among mothers with urban residence. A negative association was observed between the annual number of births at the delivery department and the cesarean section proportion. However, during the observation period, the centralization of breech deliveries to the largest departments was reduced. Conclusions. Vaginal delivery in breech presentation was particularly observed in large delivery departments and among mothers with urban residence. Since experience and practical competence are prerequisites for successful vaginal delivery, this centralization seems justified. Further centralization of all breech presentation births should be pursued. However, preparedness as to vaginal delivery should be established also at the smaller units, eg by a routine providing periodical centralized training for obstetricians working in smaller institutions.
引用
收藏
页码:416 / 421
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   The occurrence of breech presentation in Norway 1967-1994 [J].
Albrechtsen, S ;
Rasmussen, S ;
Dalaker, K ;
Irgens, LM .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1998, 77 (04) :410-415
[2]   Evaluation of a protocol for selecting fetuses in breech presentation for vaginal delivery or cesarean section [J].
Albrechtsen, S ;
Rasmussen, S ;
Reigstad, H ;
Markestad, T ;
Irgens, LM ;
Dalaker, K .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 177 (03) :586-592
[3]   THE RANDOMIZED MANAGEMENT OF TERM FRANK BREECH PRESENTATION - A STUDY OF 208 CASES [J].
COLLEA, JV ;
CHEIN, C ;
QUILLIGAN, EJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1980, 137 (02) :235-244
[4]  
ENGELMAN L, 1990, BMDP STATISTICAL SOF, V2, P1013
[5]  
ESKEW PN, 1994, J REPROD MED, V39, P809
[6]  
Gimovsky M L, 1992, J Perinatol, V12, P143
[7]  
GIMOVSKY ML, 1982, PERINATOL NEONATOL, V6, P73
[8]   Caesarean section or vaginal birth for breech presentation at term - We need better evidence as to which is better [J].
Hannah, M ;
Hannah, W .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 312 (7044) :1433-1434
[9]  
LICHTENBERG S M, 1984, Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening, V104, P1393
[10]  
LONGVA S, 1994, STANDARD CLASSIFICAT, P23