The sensory modality assessment and rehabilitation technique (SMART): a valid and reliable assessment for vegetative state and minimally conscious state patients

被引:117
作者
Gill-Thwaites, H [1 ]
Munday, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Hosp Neurodisabil, Occupat Therapy Dept, London SW15 3SW, England
关键词
D O I
10.1080/02699050410001719952
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Primary objective: To establish the reliability and validity of the Sensory Modality Assessment and Rehabilitation Technique (SMART) as a tool for discriminating awareness in patients with profound brain damage. Research design: A comparative prospective study was conducted. Method and procedures: Sixty subjects diagnosed in vegetative state (VS) on admission were assessed at 2-monthly intervals. Rancho level ratings derived from referring physicians, SMART and Western Neuro Sensory Stimulation Profile (WNSSP) scores were compared. Main outcomes and results: The intra-observer intra class correlation (ICC) was 0.97 and inter-observer ICC was 0.96, implying very little within and between observer scoring variations. A modest, although significant correlation was established between SMART and either physician or WNSSP scores. However, the correlation between the WNSSP and SMART was higher (r = 0.70) than that between WNSSP and physicians scores (r = 0.451) or between SMART and physicians (r = 0.474). Conclusion: SMART is a valid and reliable assessment for discriminating awareness in VS and Minimally Conscious State (MCS).
引用
收藏
页码:1255 / 1269
页数:15
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Misdiagnosis of the vegetative state: Retrospective study in a rehabilitation unit [J].
Andrews, K ;
Murphy, L ;
Munday, R ;
Littlewood, C .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 313 (7048) :13-16
[2]   International working party on the management of the vegetative state: Summary report [J].
Andrews, K .
BRAIN INJURY, 1996, 10 (11) :797-806
[3]  
ANSELL BJ, 1989, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V70, P104
[4]  
ASHWAL S, 1994, NEW ENGL J MED, V330, P1499
[5]  
ASHWAL S, 1994, NEW ENGL J MED, V330, P1572
[6]  
Black D, 1996, J ROY COLL PHYS LOND, V30, P119
[7]  
Bland JM, 1996, BRIT MED J, V313, P744
[8]  
*BRIT SOC REH, 1998, WORK PART REP BRIT S
[9]   An analysis of assessment instruments for the minimally responsive patient (MRP): clinical observations [J].
Canedo, A ;
Grix, MC ;
Nicoletti, J .
BRAIN INJURY, 2002, 16 (05) :453-461
[10]   ACCURACY OF DIAGNOSIS OF PERSISTENT VEGETATIVE STATE [J].
CHILDS, NL ;
MERCER, WN ;
CHILDS, HW .
NEUROLOGY, 1993, 43 (08) :1465-1467