Testable dark energy predictions from current data

被引:37
作者
Mortonson, Michael J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Hu, Wayne [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Huterer, Dragan [6 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Ctr Cosmol & AstroParticle Phys, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Dept Phys, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[3] Univ Chicago, Kavli Inst Cosmol Phys, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[4] Univ Chicago, Enrico Fermi Inst, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[5] Univ Chicago, Dept Astron & Astrophys, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Dept Phys, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
HUBBLE-SPACE-TELESCOPE; COSMOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS; DISTANCE; LIGHT;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevD.81.063007
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Given a class of dark energy models, constraints from one set of cosmic acceleration observables make predictions for other observables. Here we present the allowed ranges for the expansion rate H(z), distances D(z), and the linear growth function G(z) ( as well as other, derived growth observables) from the current combination of cosmological measurements of supernovae, the cosmic microwave background, baryon acoustic oscillations, and the Hubble constant. With a cosmological constant as the dark energy and assuming near-minimal neutrino masses, the growth function is already predicted to better than 2% precision at any redshift, with or without spatial curvature. Direct measurements of growth that match this precision offer the opportunity to stringently test and potentially rule out a cosmological constant. While predictions in the broader class of quintessence models are weaker, it is remarkable that they are typically only a factor of 2-3 less precise than forecasted predictions for future space-based supernovae and Planck CMB measurements. In particular, measurements of growth at any redshift, or the Hubble constant H-0, that exceed Lambda CDM predictions by substantially more than 2% would rule out not only a cosmological constant but also the whole quintessence class, with or without curvature and early dark energy. Barring additional systematic errors hiding in the data, such a discovery would require more exotic explanations of cosmic acceleration such as phantom dark energy, dark energy clustering, or modifications of gravity.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
ALBRECHT AJ, ARXIV09010721
[2]   Evaluating dark energy probes using multidimensional dark energy parameters [J].
Albrecht, Andreas ;
Bernstein, Gary .
PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2007, 75 (10)
[3]  
ALDERING G, ARXIVASTROPH0405232, P54011
[4]  
[Anonymous], ARXIVASTROPH0609591
[5]   Accelerating universes with scaling dark matter [J].
Chevallier, M ;
Polarski, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS D, 2001, 10 (02) :213-223
[6]   Can we ever distinguish between quintessence and a cosmological constant? [J].
Chongchitnan, Sirichai ;
Efstathiou, George .
PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2007, 76 (04)
[7]   Bayesian methods for cosmological parameter estimation from cosmic microwave background measurements [J].
Christensen, N ;
Meyer, R ;
Knox, L ;
Luey, B .
CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM GRAVITY, 2001, 18 (14) :2677-2688
[8]   Experimental results on neutrino oscillations [J].
Dore, U. ;
Orestano, D. .
REPORTS ON PROGRESS IN PHYSICS, 2008, 71 (10)
[9]  
Dunkley J, 2005, MON NOT R ASTRON SOC, V356, P925, DOI 10.1111/j.l365-2966.2004.08464.x
[10]   FIVE-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE OBSERVATIONS: LIKELIHOODS AND PARAMETERS FROM THE WMAP DATA [J].
Dunkley, J. ;
Komatsu, E. ;
Nolta, M. R. ;
Spergel, D. N. ;
Larson, D. ;
Hinshaw, G. ;
Page, L. ;
Bennett, C. L. ;
Gold, B. ;
Jarosik, N. ;
Weiland, J. L. ;
Halpern, M. ;
Hill, R. S. ;
Kogut, A. ;
Limon, M. ;
Meyer, S. S. ;
Tucker, G. S. ;
Wollack, E. ;
Wright, E. L. .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES, 2009, 180 (02) :306-329