A randomized, controlled trial to assess the efficacy and safety of a transdermal delivery system of nicotine/mecamylamine in cigarette smokers

被引:27
作者
Glover, Elbert D.
Laflin, Molly T.
Schuh, Kory J.
Schuh, Leslie M.
Nides, Mitch
Christen, Arden G.
Glover, Penny N.
Strnad, Julia V.
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Coll Hlth & Human Performance, Dept Publ & Commun Hlth, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Bowling Green State Univ, Sch Family & Consumer Sci Bowling, Bowling Green, OH USA
[3] Wayne State Univ, Dept Psychiat & Behav Neurosci, Detroit, MI USA
[4] Indiana Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Oral Biol, Indianapolis, IN USA
关键词
clinical trial; mecamylamine; nicotine replacement; smoking cessation; transdermal patch;
D O I
10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01763.x
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims To determine the efficacy and safety of nicotine transdermal therapy co-administered with the nicotine antagonist, mecamylamine, compared to a nicotine transdermal patch alone (21 mg nicotine + 6 mg mecamylamine, 21 mg nicotine + 3 mg mecamylamine, and 21 mg nicotine + 0 mg mecamylamine). Design Multi-center (n = 4), double-blind, randomized, parallel group, repeat-dose study. Setting Clinical laboratory. Participants A total of 540 subjects were enrolled into the study-135 from each of four sites; 180 patients in each of three treatment arms. Intervention Treatment was administered for the first 6 weeks of the 8-week study. Patients were instructed to continue smoking for the first 2 weeks of treatment. Measurements The primary efficacy parameter was 4-week continuous abstinence after the quit date, confirmed with an expired carbon monoxide of < 10 parts per million. Findings Analysis of the 4-week continuous abstinence for the intent-to-treat population showed overall rates of 29% (nicotine + 6 mg mecamylamine), 29% (nicotine + 3 mg mecamylamine) and 23% (nicotine only) using the slip definition which allows smoking in the first 2 weeks after the quit date. Statistical analyses revealed no significant treatment differences. Analyses using the strict definition (no smoking after the quit date) yielded similar non-significant group differences (29%, 27%, 26%). Conclusion If adding mecamylamine to nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) improves the chances of success at stopping smoking, the results of this study suggest that the effect is very small.
引用
收藏
页码:795 / 802
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
CLARKE PBS, 1991, BRIT J ADDICT, V86, P501
[2]   MECAMYLAMINE BLOCKADE OF NICOTINE RESPONSES - EVIDENCE FOR 2 BRAIN NICOTINIC RECEPTORS [J].
COLLINS, AC ;
EVANS, CB ;
MINER, LL ;
MARKS, MJ .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1986, 24 (06) :1767-1773
[3]   AGONIST AND ANTAGONIST PROPERTIES OF BUPRENORPHINE, A NEW ANTINOCICEPTIVE AGENT [J].
COWAN, A ;
LEWIS, JW ;
MACFARLANE, IR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1977, 60 (04) :537-545
[4]  
Cox LS., 2001, Nicotine Tob Res, V3, P7, DOI [DOI 10.1080/14622200020032051, DOI 10.1080/14622200124218]
[5]  
Eissenberg T, 1996, PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, V127, P328, DOI 10.1007/BF02806011
[6]   Varenicline, an α4β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor partial agonist, vs sustained-release bupropion and placebo for smoking cessation -: A randomized controlled trial [J].
Gonzales, David ;
Rennard, Stephen I. ;
Nides, Mitchell ;
Oncken, Cheryl ;
Azoulay, Salomon ;
Billing, Clare B. ;
Watsky, Eric J. ;
Gong, Jason ;
Williams, Kathryn E. ;
Reeves, Karen R. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 296 (01) :47-55
[7]  
HEATHERTON TF, 1991, BRIT J ADDICT, V86, P1119
[8]  
JOHNSON RE, 1990, CLIN PHARMACOL THER, V47, P525
[9]   Efficacy of varenicline, an α4β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor partial agonist, vs placebo or sustained-release bupropion for smoking cessation -: A randomized controlled trial [J].
Jorenby, Douglas E. ;
Hays, J. Taylor ;
Rigotti, Nancy A. ;
Azoulay, Salomon ;
Watsky, Eric J. ;
Williams, Kathryn E. ;
Billing, Clare B. ;
Gong, Jason ;
Reeves, Karen R. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 296 (01) :56-63
[10]  
NEMETHCOSLETT R, 1986, PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, V88, P420