Genetics, taxonomy, and conservation of the threatened California Gnatcatcher

被引:113
作者
Zink, RM [1 ]
Barrowclough, GF
Atwood, JL
Blackwell-Rago, RC
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, JF Bell Museum, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Dept Ecol Evolut & Behav, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
[3] Amer Museum Nat Hist, Dept Ornithol, New York, NY 10024 USA
[4] Manomet Ctr Conservat Sci, Manomet, MA 02345 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99082.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The California Gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica) has become a flagship species in the dispute over development of southern California's unique coastal sage scrub habitat a fragile, geographically restricted ecosystem with high endemism. One aspect of the controversy concerns the status of the subspecies of this bird in southern California coastal sage scrub that is currently listed ns threatened under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. To investigate the recent population history of this species and the genetic distinctiveness of subspecies and to inform conservation planning, we used direct sequencing of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) for 64 individuals from 13 samples taken throughout the species' range. We found that coastal sage scrub populations of California Gnatcatchers are not genetically distinct from populations in Baja California, which are dense and continuously distributed throughout the peninsula. Rather, mtDNA sequences from this species contain the signatures of population growth and support a hypothesis of recent expansion of populations from a southern Baja California refugium northward into the southern coastal regions of California. During this expansion, stochastic events led to a reduction in genetic variation in the newly occupied range. Thus, preservation of coastal sage scrub cannot be linked to maintaining the genetic diversity of northern gnatcatcher populations, despite previous recognition of subspecies Our study suggests that not all currently recognized subspecies are equivalent to evolutionarily significant units and illustrates the danger of focusing conservation efforts for threatened habitats on a single species.
引用
收藏
页码:1394 / 1405
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Atwood J.L., 1991, Bulletin Southern California Academy of Sciences, V90, P118
[2]  
ATWOOD JL, 1988, ORNITHOLOGICAL MONOG, V42
[3]  
Atwood Jonathan L., 1993, P149
[4]   Pleistocene phylogeographic effects on avian populations and the speciation process [J].
Avise, JC ;
Walker, D .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1998, 265 (1395) :457-463
[5]  
Avise John C., 1994, pi
[6]  
Baker Allan J., 1997, P51, DOI 10.1016/B978-012498315-1/50005-4
[7]  
BALL RM, 1992, AUK, V109, P626
[8]  
Barrowclough George F., 1996, P247
[9]  
Barrowclough GF, 1999, P 22 INT ORN C, V22, P1914
[10]  
Cronin MA, 1997, WILDLIFE SOC B, V25, P661