The epidemiology of labor induction: Arizona, 1997

被引:47
作者
Coonrod, DV [1 ]
Bay, RC
Kishi, GY
机构
[1] Maricopa Integrated Hlth Syst & Med Profess Arizo, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Womens Hlth, Phoenix, AZ USA
[2] Maricopa Integrated Hlth Syst & Med Profess Arizo, Dept Acad Affairs, Phoenix, AZ USA
关键词
ethnic groups; induced labor; risk factors; socioeconomic factors;
D O I
10.1067/mob.2000.106248
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to describe labor induction risk factors and consequences among women with term singleton gestations with vertex presentation. STUDY DESIGN: Arizona births in 1997 (N = 65,607) were studied by means of stratified analysis and logistic regression, RESULTS: Labor induction occurred in 20.3% (n = 13,288). Labor induction risk factors were as follows: race or ethnicity (white non-Hispanic 25.3%; Hispanic, 13.9%; foreign-born Hispanic, 10.3%; and US-born Hispanic, 18.5%), education (<12 years, 14.1%; >12 years, 24.6%), payor (private insurance, 24.5%; Medicaid, 16.7%), hospital type (government controlled, 13.7%; investor owned, 30.5%). Race or ethnicity and hospital type remained important determinants of labor induction in the multivariate analysis. Relative risks of cesarean delivery with labor induction were as follows: nulliparous, 1.38; parous with no previous cesarean delivery, 1.00; and parous with previous cesarean delivery, 0.50. CONCLUSION: Large variations in labor induction were noted across maternal ethnicity and hospital type categories. Labor induction increased cesarean delivery rates among nulliparous women, whereas no increase was seen among parous women with no previous cesarean delivery. Labor induction was used less often among those with previous cesarean delivery; when it was used in this group, however, it was associated with a lower cesarean delivery rate.
引用
收藏
页码:1355 / 1360
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   RACIAL ETHNIC-DIFFERENCES IN THE LIKELIHOOD OF CESAREAN DELIVERY, CALIFORNIA [J].
BRAVEMAN, P ;
EGERTER, S ;
EDMONSTON, F ;
VERDON, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1995, 85 (05) :625-630
[2]   INDUCTION OF LABOR - 6 YEAR REVIEW [J].
CLINCH, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1979, 86 (05) :340-342
[3]  
CROWLEY P, 1998, PREGNANCY CHILDBIRTH
[4]   RELATION OF PRIVATE OR CLINIC CARE TO THE CESAREAN BIRTH-RATE [J].
DEREGT, RH ;
MINKOFF, HL ;
FELDMAN, J ;
SCHWARZ, RH .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1986, 315 (10) :619-624
[5]   Large differences in obstetrical intervention rates among Dutch hospitals, even after adjustment for population differences [J].
ElferinkStinkens, PM ;
Brand, R ;
leCessie, S ;
VanHemel, OJS .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1996, 68 (1-2) :97-103
[6]  
FEARL JD, 1986, T 53 ANN M PAC COAST, P82
[7]   SOCIOECONOMIC DIFFERENCES IN RATES OF CESAREAN-SECTION [J].
GOULD, JB ;
DAVEY, B ;
STAFFORD, RS .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1989, 321 (04) :233-239
[8]   LABOR INDUCTION POLICY IN HOSPITALS OF DIFFERENT LEVELS OF SPECIALIZATION [J].
JARVELIN, MR ;
HARTIKAINENSORRI, AL ;
RANTAKALLIO, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1993, 100 (04) :310-315
[9]   ELECTIVE INDUCTION VERSUS SPONTANEOUS LABOR - A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF COMPLICATIONS AND OUTCOME [J].
MACER, JA ;
MACER, CL ;
CHAN, LS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1992, 166 (06) :1690-1697
[10]  
Mathews T J, 1997, Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co, V78, P20