Relative efficacy of oral analgesics after third molar extraction

被引:82
作者
Barden, J [1 ]
Edwards, JE [1 ]
McQuay, HJ [1 ]
Wiffen, PJ [1 ]
Moore, RA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Oxford Radcliffe Hosp, Pain Res & Nuffield Dept Anaesthet, Oxford OX3 7LJ, England
关键词
D O I
10.1038/sj.bdj.4811721
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives To compare the relative efficacy of analgesics after third molar extraction from systematic reviews of randomised, double blind studies. Data sources Dental trials from systematic reviews of randomised, double-blind studies of analgesics in acute pain. Data selection Number of patients with moderate or severe pain achieving at least half pain relief over 4 to 6 hours after a single oral dose of analgesic. Data extraction Independently by two reviewers. Data synthesis Use of dichotomous information from active and placebo treatments, first to calculate the statistical significance using relative risk, and then to evaluate the clinical relevance using number needed to treat (NNT). Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors had the lowest (best) NNTs for the outcome of at least half pain relief over 4-6 hours compared with placebo. With the best performing analgesics, 50-70 patients out of 100 had good pain relief compared with about 10 out of 100 with placebo. Only paracetamol 600/650 mg plus codeine 60 mg was associated with any significant increase in any patient experiencing an adverse event. Conclusions NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors have the lowest (best) NNTs. They may also have fewer adverse effects after third molar surgery, though conclusive evidence is lacking. At least 80% of analgesic prescribing by UK dentists is in line with the best available evidence on efficacy and safety.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 411
页数:5
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], BMJ
[2]   Single-dose rofecoxib for acute postoperative pain in adults: A quantitative systematic review [J].
Barden J. ;
Edwards J.E. ;
McQuay H.J. ;
Moore R.A. .
BMC Anesthesiology, 2 (1)
[3]  
BEECHER HK, 1957, PHARMACOL REV, V9, P59
[4]  
BEECHER HK, 1953, J PHARM, V109, P93
[5]   Randomization is important in studies with pain outcomes: Systematic review of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in acute postoperative pain [J].
Carroll, D ;
Tramer, M ;
McQuay, H ;
Nye, B ;
Moore, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1996, 77 (06) :798-803
[6]  
COLLINS SL, 2000, COCHRANE LIB
[7]   THE NUMBER NEEDED TO TREAT - A CLINICALLY USEFUL MEASURE OF TREATMENT EFFECT [J].
COOK, RJ ;
SACKETT, DL .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 310 (6977) :452-454
[8]  
COOPER SA, 1991, ADV PAIN RES THERAPY, V18, P117
[9]   Oral aspirin in postoperative pain: a quantitative systematic review [J].
Edwards, JE ;
Oldman, AD ;
Smith, LA ;
Carroll, D ;
Wiffen, PJ ;
McQuay, HJ ;
Moore, RA .
PAIN, 1999, 81 (03) :289-297
[10]   Reporting of adverse effects in clinical trials should be improved: Lessons from acute postoperative pain [J].
Edwards, JE ;
McQuay, HJ ;
Moore, RA ;
Collins, SL .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 1999, 18 (06) :427-437