Appropriate statistical methods are required to assess diagnostic tests for replacement, add-on, and triage

被引:72
作者
Hayen, Andrew [1 ]
Macaskill, Petra [1 ]
Irwig, Les [1 ]
Bossuyt, Patrick [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sydney Sch Publ Hlth, Screening & Test Evaluat Program, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Diagnostic accuracy; Sensitivity and specificity; Likelihood ratios; Biostatistics; LIKELIHOOD RATIOS; SCREENING-TESTS; SENSITIVITY; ACCURACY; SPECIFICITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.08.024
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To explain which measures of accuracy and which statistical methods should be used in studies to assess the value of a new binary test as a replacement test, an add-on test, or a triage test. Study Design and Setting: Selection and explanation of statistical methods, illustrated with examples. Results: Statistical methods for comparative diagnostic accuracy studies are described that take into account the purpose of the new diagnostic test. Methods are described within a framework that defines the major purpose of test comparison: assessing the value of a new test as a replacement test, an add-on test, or a triage test. Methods appropriate for both unpaired and paired study designs for binary test data are given, including regression modeling of diagnostic test accuracy. Implications for efficient study designs are also discussed. Conclusions: Appropriate selection of existing statistical methods is necessary to address research questions about the comparative accuracy of new tests. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:883 / 891
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction
[3]  
Biggerstaff BJ, 2000, STAT MED, V19, P649, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000315)19:5<649::AID-SIM371>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-H
[5]   Interpreting diagnostic test accuracy studies [J].
Bossuyt, Patrick M. M. .
SEMINARS IN HEMATOLOGY, 2008, 45 (03) :189-195
[6]   Diagnosis - Comparative accuracy: assessing new tests against existing diagnostic pathways [J].
Bossuyt, PM ;
Irwig, L ;
Craig, J ;
Glasziou, P .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 332 (7549) :1089-1092
[7]   Comparison of the accuracy of two tests with a confirmatory procedure limited to positive results [J].
Cheng, H ;
Macaluso, M .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 8 (01) :104-106
[8]   Comparing dichotomous screening tests when individuals negative on both tests are not verified [J].
Chock, C ;
Irwig, L ;
Berry, G ;
Glasziou, P .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 50 (11) :1211-1217
[9]   The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance [J].
Glas, AS ;
Lijmer, JG ;
Prins, MH ;
Bonsel, GJ ;
Bossuyt, PMM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 56 (11) :1129-1135
[10]   Sydney Breast Imaging Accuracy Study: comparative sensitivity and specificity of mammography and sonography in young women with symptoms. [J].
Houssami, N ;
Irwig, L ;
Simpson, JM ;
McKessar, M ;
Blome, S ;
Noakes, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2003, 180 (04) :935-940