Cost utility analysis of first-line hormonal therapy in advanced breast cancer - Comparison of two aromatase inhibitors to tamoxifen

被引:26
作者
Dranitsaris, G
Verma, S
Trudeau, M
机构
[1] Princess Margaret Hosp, Ontario Canc Inst, Ottawa Reg Canc Ctr, Dept Mol Biol, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
[2] Toronto Sunnybrook Reg Canc Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS | 2003年 / 26卷 / 03期
关键词
letrozole; anastrozole; tamoxifen; cost analysis; breast cancer;
D O I
10.1097/00000421-200306000-00017
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Recent randomized clinical trials (RCT) comparing anastrozole (Arimidex) and letrozole (Femara) to tamoxifen in the first-line treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced hormone-sensitive breast cancer have demonstrated that both agents were at least as effective as tamoxifen. In addition, one RCT has revealed significant superiority of letrozole to tamoxifen with regard to tumor response rate and time to progression. Based on the efficacy and toxicity data, anastrozole or letrozole may replace tamoxifen. A cost effectiveness analysis was undertaken to determine whether the new agents are economically acceptable alternatives to tamoxifen. In the absence of a randomized three-arm trial, a decision model was developed to simulate and compare the most common therapeutic outcomes. The clinical data were obtained from a meta analysis of modem (i.e., post- 1990) randomized trials. Clinical outcomes data from the various trials were statistically pooled using a random effects model to provide point estimates and 95%-confidence intervals. Total hospital resource consumption was collected from the charts of 87 patients with advanced disease who had failed tamoxifen therapy. The model suggested a comparable duration of quality-adjusted progression-free survival between letrozole and anastrozole, both being superior to tamoxifen (179 days vs. 172 days vs. 161 days). Letrozole and anastrozole had overall costs of Can$2,883 and $2,847 per patient, respectively, which were marginally higher than tamoxifen at $Can2,258 per patient. When the costs and benefits were combined, the data generated an incremental cost per quality-adjusted progression-free year of $12,500 and $19,600 for letrozole and anastrozole, respectively, relative to tamoxifen. Letrozole and anastrozole are both economically acceptable alternatives to tamoxifen in the first-line treatment setting. However, when efficacy and cost effectiveness are considered together, letrozole could be preferentially considered.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 296
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   A PHASE-III RANDOMIZED TRIAL OC CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, MITOXANTRONE, AND 5-FLUOROURACIL (CNF) VERSUS CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, ADRIAMYCIN, AND 5-FLUOROURACIL (CAF) IN PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC BREAST-CANCER [J].
ALONSO, MC ;
TABERNERO, JM ;
OJEDA, B ;
LLANOS, M ;
SOLA, C ;
CLIMENT, MA ;
SEGUI, MA ;
LOPEZ, JJ .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1995, 34 (01) :15-24
[2]   A RANDOMIZED MULTICENTER TRIAL COMPARING MITOXANTRONE, CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, AND FLUOROURACIL WITH DOXORUBICIN, CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, AND FLUOROURACIL IN THE THERAPY OF METASTATIC BREAST-CARCINOMA [J].
BENNETT, JM ;
MUSS, HB ;
DOROSHOW, JH ;
WOLFF, S ;
KREMENTZ, ET ;
CARTWRIGHT, K ;
DUKART, G ;
REISMAN, A ;
SCHOCH, I .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1988, 6 (10) :1611-1620
[3]   Anastrozole versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer in 668 postmenopausal women:: Results of the tamoxifen or arimidex randomized group efficacy and tolerability study [J].
Bonneterre, J ;
Thürlimann, B ;
Robertson, JFR ;
Krzakowski, M ;
Mauriac, L ;
Koralewski, P ;
Vergote, I ;
Webster, A ;
Steinberg, M ;
von Euler, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (22) :3748-3757
[4]  
BONNETERRE J, 1997, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V16, pA162
[5]  
CARRION RP, 1994, ANN ONCOL S7, V5, pS19
[6]   METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[7]  
DIERAS V, 1995, SEMIN ONCOL, V22, P33
[8]   Cost-utility analysis of second-line hormonal therapy in advanced breast cancer: a comparison of two aromatase inhibitors to megestrol acetate [J].
Dranitsaris, G ;
Leung, P ;
Mather, J ;
Oza, A .
ANTI-CANCER DRUGS, 2000, 11 (07) :591-601
[9]  
Falkson CI, 1996, ANN ONCOL, V7, P465
[10]  
Forbes John F., 1997, Seminars in Oncology, V24, P5