Inventor networks in renewable energies: The influence of the policy mix in Germany

被引:88
作者
Cantner, Uwe [1 ,2 ]
Graf, Holger [1 ]
Herrmann, Johannes [1 ]
Kalthaus, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jena, Dept Econ, Carl Zeiss Str 3, D-07743 Jena, Germany
[2] Univ Southern Denmark, I2M Grp, Dept Mkt & Management, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark
关键词
Renewable energy; Inventor network; Policy mix; Systemic instrument; Technology push; Demand pull; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY COLLABORATION; DEVELOPMENT SUBSIDIES; TECHNOLOGY-PUSH; DEMAND-PULL; ENVIRONMENTAL-POLICY; KNOWLEDGE NETWORKS; RESEARCH CONSORTIA; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; PUBLIC SUBSIDIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.005
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Technological change and gains in efficiency of renewable power generation technologies are to a large extent driven by governmental support. Various policy instruments that can broadly be categorized as technology push, demand pull or systemic constitute part of the policy mix for renewable energies. Our goal is to gain insights into the influence of this policy mix on the intensity and organization of inventive activities for wind power and photovoltaics in Germany since the 1980s. We examine the effect of different instruments on the size and structure of co-inventor networks based on patent data. Our results indicate notable differences between the technologies: the network size for wind power is driven by technology push and systemic instruments, while in photovoltaics, demand pull is decisive for network growth. By and large, the instruments complement each other and form a consistent mix of policy instruments. The structure of the networks is driven by demand pull for both technologies. Systemic instruments increase interaction, especially in the wind power network, and are complementary to demand pull in fostering collaboration. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1165 / 1184
页数:20
相关论文
共 133 条
  • [1] Co-authorship in management and organizational studies: An empirical and network analysis
    Acedo, Francisco Jose
    Barroso, Carmen
    Casanueva, Cristobal
    Galan, Jose Luis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2006, 43 (05) : 957 - 983
  • [2] Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study
    Ahuja, G
    [J]. ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2000, 45 (03) : 425 - 455
  • [3] Does Firm Size make a Difference? Analysing the Effectiveness of R&D Subsidies in East Germany
    Alecke, Bjoern
    Mitze, Timo
    Reinkowski, Janina
    Untiedt, Gerhard
    [J]. GERMAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 13 (02) : 174 - 195
  • [4] HETEROSKEDASTICITY AND AUTOCORRELATION CONSISTENT COVARIANCE-MATRIX ESTIMATION
    ANDREWS, DWK
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 1991, 59 (03) : 817 - 858
  • [5] Angrist JD, 1996, J AM STAT ASSOC, V91, P444, DOI 10.2307/2291629
  • [6] [Anonymous], DAT COLL FEB 2014
  • [7] [Anonymous], 1992, ENVIRON RESOUR ECON
  • [8] [Anonymous], SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL
  • [9] [Anonymous], SEED WORKING PAPER S
  • [10] [Anonymous], ERN EN QUELL ARB EN