Private enforcement: Litigation as a tool to prevent obesity

被引:8
作者
Daynard, RA
Howard, PT
Wilking, CL
机构
[1] Tobacco Control Resource Ctr, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Publ Hlth Advocacy Inst, Boston, MA 02116 USA
[3] Howard & Associates PA, Tallahassee, FL 32312 USA
[4] Northeastern Univ, Law Policy & Soc Program, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Northeastern Univ, Sch Law, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1057/palgrave.jphp.3190039
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Private enforcement, or litigation, has played a historic role in protecting public health in the United States. Litigation is often employed as a means to protect public health when government regulation is absent or ineffectual. Litigation has been successfully employed to control both asbestos and tobacco and is poised for success in combating the obesity epidemic. Litigation is effective because it makes public industry practices and increases industry self-policing. Litigation related to obesity would likely employ theories of "unfair and deceptive trade practice" or general "personal injury" or tort claims. While opponents to the use of litigation often cite personal responsibility and the individual as the true locus of liability, these arguments fail to take into account the context of an individual's choice. While litigation can be effective, media attention and current political discourse on "tort reform" has engendered a set of legislative actions that would foreclose litigation as a public health strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:408 / 417
页数:10
相关论文
共 5 条
[1]  
BARBOZA D, 2003, NY TIMES 0703, P6
[2]  
Bray GA, 2004, AM J CLIN NUTR, V79, P537
[3]  
GRIMES W, 2004, NY TIMES 0307
[4]   Preventing childhood obesity by reducing consumption of carbonated drinks: cluster randomised controlled trial [J].
James, J ;
Thomas, P ;
Cavan, D ;
Kerr, D .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7450) :1237-1239
[5]  
Nestle Marion., 2002, Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health