Determinants and consequences of discrepancies in menstrual and ultrasonographic gestational age estimates

被引:72
作者
Morin, I
Morin, L
Zhang, X
Platt, RW
Blondel, B
Bréart, G
Usher, R
Kramer, MS
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Fac Med, Dept Pediat, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Fac Med, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] INSERM, U149, Villejuif, France
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00311.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives To assess the association between maternal and fetal characteristics and discrepancy between last normal menstrual period and early (<20 weeks) ultrasound-based gestational age and the association between discrepancies and pregnancy outcomes. Design Hospital-based cohort study. Setting Montreal, Canada. Sample A total of 46,514 women with both menstrual- and early ultrasound-based gestational age estimates. Main outcome measures Positive (last normal menstrual period > early ultrasound, i.e. menstrual-based gestational age is higher than early ultrasound-based gestational age, so that the expected date of delivery is earlier with the menstrual-based gestational age) discrepancies greater than or equal to+7 days, mean birthweight, low birthweight, stillbirth and in-hospital neonatal death. Results Multiparous mothers and those with diabetes, small stature or high pre-pregnancy body mass index were more likely to have positive discrepancies. The proportion of women with discrepancies greater than or equal to+7 days was significantly higher among chromosomally malformed and female fetuses. The mean birthweight declined with increasingly positive differences. The risk of low birthweight was significantly higher for positive differences. Associations with fetal growth measures were more plausible with early ultrasound estimates. Conclusions Although most discrepancies between last normal menstrual period- and early ultrasound-based gestational age are attributable to errors in menstrual dating, our results suggest that some positive differences reflect early growth restriction.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 152
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   TERM PREDICTION IN ROUTINE ULTRASOUND PRACTICE [J].
BACKE, B ;
NAKLING, J .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1994, 73 (02) :113-118
[2]  
Blondel A, 2002, BJOG-INT J OBSTET GY, V109, P718
[3]   CLASSICAL AND TRUE GESTATIONAL POSTMATURITY [J].
BOYCE, A ;
MAYAUX, MJ ;
SCHWARTZ, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1976, 125 (07) :911-914
[4]   Gestational age and induction of labour for prolonged pregnancy [J].
Gardosi, J ;
Vanner, T ;
Francis, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1997, 104 (07) :792-797
[5]   Errors in gestational age:: Evidence of bleeding early in pregnancy [J].
Gjessing, HK ;
Skjærven, R ;
Wilcox, AJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1999, 89 (02) :213-218
[6]   PREMATURITY, POSTDATES, AND GROWTH-RETARDATION - THE INFLUENCE OF USE OF ULTRASONOGRAPHY ON REPORTED GESTATIONAL-AGE [J].
GOLDENBERG, RL ;
DAVIS, RO ;
CUTTER, GR ;
HOFFMAN, HJ ;
BRUMFIELD, CG ;
FOSTER, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1989, 160 (02) :462-470
[7]   MATERNAL RISK-FACTORS AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON FETAL ANTHROPOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS [J].
GOLDENBERG, RL ;
DAVIS, RO ;
CLIVER, SP ;
CUTTER, GR ;
HOFFMAN, HJ ;
DUBARD, MB ;
COPPER, RL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1993, 168 (04) :1197-1205
[8]  
GUERRERO R, 1969, LANCET, V2, P268
[9]   BIAS IN STUDIES OF PRETERM AND POSTTERM DELIVERY DUE TO ULTRASOUND ASSESSMENT OF GESTATIONAL-AGE [J].
HENRIKSEN, TB ;
WILCOX, AJ ;
HEDEGAARD, M ;
SECHER, NJ .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 6 (05) :533-537
[10]   Early dating by ultrasound and perinatal outcome - a cohort study [J].
Hogberg, U ;
Larsson, N .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1997, 76 (10) :907-912