Exit, voice and loyalty: Analytic and empirical developments

被引:119
作者
Dowding, K
John, P
Mergoupis, T
Van Vugt, M
机构
[1] London Sch Econ, Dept Govt, London WC2A 2AE, England
[2] Univ London, Birkbeck Coll, Dept Polit & Sociol, London, England
[3] London Sch Econ, CPNSS, London, England
[4] Univ Southampton, Dept Psychol, Southampton SO9 5NH, Hants, England
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1475-6765.00522
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
This paper seeks to reconstruct and revitalize the famous Hirschman framework by providing a comprehensive review of the current use of 'exit, voice and loyalty'. We begin by critically examining Hirchman's original account, and then look at the way his argument has been extended in different fields both conceptually and empirically. We suggest that while advances have been made, the results so far are somewhat disappointing given the perceptiveness of the original insight. We believe this is because his apparently simple schema is more complex than it first appears, and different aspects of exit, of voice, and of empirical foundations of loyalty need to be analytically distinguished in order to produce testable empirical hypotheses about their relationships.
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 495
页数:27
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   TRADE-UNIONS, ABSENTEEISM, AND EXIT-VOICE [J].
ALLEN, SG .
INDUSTRIAL & LABOR RELATIONS REVIEW, 1984, 37 (03) :331-345
[2]  
Anthony Downs., 1957, An economic theory of democracy
[3]   EXIT, VOICE, AND LOYALTY [J].
BARRY, B .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1974, 4 (JAN) :79-107
[4]   Job satisfaction, trade unions, and exit-voice revisited [J].
Bender, KA ;
Sloane, PJ .
INDUSTRIAL & LABOR RELATIONS REVIEW, 1998, 51 (02) :222-240
[5]  
Birch A. H., 1975, BRIT J POLIT SCI, V6, P463
[6]  
Black D., 1958, THEORY COMMITTEES EL
[7]  
Blanz M, 1998, EUR J SOC PSYCHOL, V28, P697, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199809/10)28:5<697::AID-EJSP889>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-#
[9]  
BREMMER I, 1994, EUROPE-ASIA STUD, V46, P26
[10]   AN EXIT VOICE MODEL OF MANAGERIAL ATTACHMENT [J].
CANNINGS, K .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1989, 12 (01) :107-129