Chest radiographs in the emergency department: is the radiologist really necessary?

被引:90
作者
Gatt, ME
Spectre, G
Paltiel, O
Hiller, N
Stalnikowicz, R
机构
[1] Hadassah Univ Hosp, Dept Med, IL-91240 Jerusalem, Israel
[2] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Hadassah Med Sch, Hematol Unit, IL-91010 Jerusalem, Israel
[3] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Hadassah Med Sch, Dept Social Med, IL-91010 Jerusalem, Israel
[4] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Hadassah Med Sch, Dept Radiol, IL-91010 Jerusalem, Israel
[5] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Hadassah Med Sch, Dept Emergency, IL-91010 Jerusalem, Israel
关键词
D O I
10.1136/pmj.79.930.214
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The chest radiograph is considered one of the most complex imaging modalities to interpret. Several studies have evaluated radiograph interpretation in the emergency department, and considerable disagreement among clinical physicians and expert radiologists has been observed in the reading of chest films. The interpretation of chest radiographs by emergency department physicians was compared with senior radiologists in discharged patients, and misinterpretations assessed in relation to the physician's level of training. Methods: Radiological descriptions of 509 chest radiographs of 507 patients, aged 16-98 years who were discharged from the emergency department, were prospectively reviewed. Missed findings were recorded with regard to the physician's level of training and experience. The effects of misinterpretations on discharge recommendations were also investigated. Statistical assessment was conducted using the chi(2) test. Interobserver agreement was also tested by the. coefficient. Results: The sensitivity for detecting different abnormalities in the radiographs ranged from 20% to 64.9% and specificity from 94.9% to 98.7%. Despite the low sensitivities found, there were relatively few clinical implications of the "missed" findings since they were either of a minor nature or appropriate follow up was prescribed. The overall interobserver reliability, assessed by the. coefficient, was 0.40 (95% confidence interval 0.35 to 0.46). These findings did not change significantly by emergency department physician's level of training. Conclusions: Emergency department physicians frequently miss specific radiographic abnormalities and there is considerable discrepancy between their interpretations and those of trained radiologists. These findings highlight the importance of routine evaluation of chest radiographs by a well trained radiologist and emphasise the need for improving interpretive skills among emergency department physicians.
引用
收藏
页码:214 / 217
页数:4
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Interobserver reliability of the chest radiograph in community-acquired pneumonia [J].
Albaum, MN ;
Hill, LC ;
Murphy, M ;
Li, YH ;
Fuhrman, CR ;
Britton, CA ;
Kapoor, WN ;
Fine, MJ .
CHEST, 1996, 110 (02) :343-350
[2]   Radiographic interpretation in the emergency department [J].
Brunswick, JE ;
Ilkhanipour, K ;
Seaberg, DC ;
McGill, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1996, 14 (04) :346-348
[3]   Reducing errors made by emergency physicians in interpreting radiographs: longitudinal study [J].
Espinosa, JA ;
Nolan, TW .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 320 (7237) :737-740
[4]   INTERPRETATION OF PEDIATRIC X-RAY-FILMS BY EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT PEDIATRICIANS [J].
FLEISHER, G ;
LUDWIG, S ;
MCSORLEY, M .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1983, 12 (03) :153-158
[5]  
Fleiss J. L, 1981, STAT METHODS RATES P, P212
[6]   DISAGREEMENTS IN CHEST ROENTGEN INTERPRETATION [J].
HERMAN, PG ;
GERSON, DE ;
HESSEL, SJ ;
MAYER, BS ;
WATNICK, M ;
BLESSER, B ;
OZONOFF, D .
CHEST, 1975, 68 (03) :278-282
[7]   ACCURACY AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO EXPERIENCE IN INTERPRETATION OF CHEST RADIOGRAPHS [J].
HERMAN, PG ;
HESSEL, SJ .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1975, 10 (01) :62-67
[8]  
KRAMER MS, 1992, PEDIATRICS, V90, P11
[9]   INTERPRETATION OF CHEST ROENTGENOGRAMS BY PRIMARY CARE PHYSICIANS [J].
KURITZKY, L ;
HADDY, RI ;
CURRY, RW .
SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1987, 80 (11) :1347-1351
[10]   Radiologists' review of radiographs interpreted confidently by emergency physicians infrequently leads to changes in patient management [J].
Lufkin, KC ;
Smith, SW ;
Matticks, CA ;
Brunette, DD .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1998, 31 (02) :202-207