Stochastic modeling of flood peaks using the generalized extreme value distribution

被引:119
作者
Morrison, JE [1 ]
Smith, JA
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Dept Operat Res & Financial Engn, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[2] Princeton Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
关键词
floods; extreme value theory;
D O I
10.1029/2001WR000502
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
[1] The generalized extreme value (GEV) distribution is a standard tool for modeling flood peaks, both in annual maximum series (AMS) and in partial duration series (PDS). In this paper, combined maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) and L moment (LMOM) procedures are developed for estimating location, shape, and scale parameters of the GEV distribution. Particular attention is given to estimation of the shape parameter, which determines the "thickness'' of the upper tail of the flood frequency distribution. Mixed MLE-LMOM methods avoid problems with both MLE (estimator variance) and LMOM (estimator bias) estimators of the shape parameter. The mixed MLE-LMOM procedure is extended to use the two largest flood peaks in a year. This extension is developed in a PDS framework. Estimation procedures are applied to flood peak observations from 104 central Appalachian basins. The estimated values of the shape parameter for the central Appalachian basins are more negative than has been considered physically reasonable, independent of the estimation procedure that is used. Twenty-eight percent of mixed method estimators of the shape parameter have values less than -0.5, implying that the moments of order 2 and above are infinite. The estimated shape parameters for the central Appalachian basins do not depend on basin morphological parameters (such as drainage area) or land cover properties (such as percent urban, forest, or agricultural land use). Estimated values of the location and scale parameters for the central Appalachian watersheds correspond well with GEV-based simple scaling theory. Estimated values of the shape parameter for central Appalachian watersheds are shown to differ markedly from those of southern Appalachian watersheds and the difference is shown to be linked to contrasting properties of extreme floods. To conclude the paper, analyses of mixture distribution models are presented to address the question of whether flood peaks really have extreme "heavy tail'' behavior or whether the GEV distribution is not the appropriate model for flood peaks.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 1
页数:12
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Fractal River basins: Chance and self-organization
[2]  
Bauer E, 1996, INT J CLIMATOL, V16, P1087, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0088(199610)16:10<1087::AID-JOC68>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-#
[4]  
Bazaraa M.S., 2013, Nonlinear Programming-Theory and Algorithms, V3rd
[5]   Comparison of approaches for estimating the probability of coastal flooding [J].
Bruun, JT ;
Tawn, JA .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS, 1998, 47 :405-423
[6]   GOODNESS-OF-FIT TESTS FOR REGIONAL GENERALIZED EXTREME VALUE FLOOD DISTRIBUTIONS [J].
CHOWDHURY, JU ;
STEDINGER, JR ;
LU, LH .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1991, 27 (07) :1765-1776
[7]  
DAVISON AC, 1990, J ROY STAT SOC B MET, V52, P393
[8]   Extreme value theory based on the r largest annual events: a robust approach [J].
Dupuis, DJ .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1997, 200 (1-4) :295-306
[9]  
EISENLOHR WS, 1952, US GEOL SURV WATER B, V1134, P1
[10]  
HACK JT, 1960, US GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, V347, P1