Carbon sequestration determined using farm scale carbon balance and eddy covariance

被引:56
作者
Byrne, Kenneth A. [1 ]
Kiely, Ger [1 ]
Leahy, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Ireland Univ Coll Cork, Ctr Hydrol & Climate Change, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Cork, Ireland
关键词
greenhouse gases; grassland; carbon cycling; radiative forcing;
D O I
10.1016/j.agee.2006.11.015
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Studies using eddy covariance have shown grasslands to be both sinks and sources of carbon dioxide (CO(2)). However, such studies do not take into account the exports of carbon (C), such as in meat and milk and imports of C, such as off-farm derived C in cattle feed supplement. By coupling eddy covariance results with farm management data we quantified the farm scale C balance during 2004 for two dairy farms in South West Ireland. The system boundary for inputs and outputs of C is the farm perimeter. Carbon sequestration is determined as the difference between all C inputs and C outputs. Carbon inputs are similar in both farms with net ecosystem exchange (NEE) (2.9 +/- 0.5 t C ha(-1) year(-1)) accounting for 88 and 81% of C inputs in Farms A and B, respectively. Carbon in concentrate feed accounts for 12 and 19% of C inputs in Farms A and B, respectively. Respiration by cattle during the winter housing period, and respiration by cows during milking throughout the grazing season, are the largest C outputs and account for approximately half of C outputs on both farms. The other major sources of C output are milk, CH(4) produced by enteric fermentation and emitted during slurry spreading and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in streamflow. Carbon in meat and CH(4) emissions from dung (both in the farmyard and fields) and animal slurry in farmyard storage are minor sources of C output. The annual total C inputs are 3.30 and 3.58 t C ha(-1) and the total C outputs are 1.25 and 1.43 t C ha(-1) in Farms A and B, respectively. The net difference is 2.05 and 2.15 t C ha(-1) in Farms A and B, respectively. This suggests that both farms were net C sinks for 2004. Further work on below ground process and soil C turnover is required to determine if this C sink estimate is reflected in changes in soil C stocks. Furthermore, we estimate the global warming potential (GWP) of this grassland to be a sink for similar to 1 t CO(2) equiv. ha(-1) year(-1). (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 364
页数:8
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Assessing the eddy covariance technique for evaluating carbon dioxide exchange rates of ecosystems: past, present and future [J].
Baldocchi, DD .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2003, 9 (04) :479-492
[2]   Estimates of N2O and CH4 fluxes from agricultural lands in various regions in Europe [J].
Boeckx, P ;
Van Cleemput, O .
NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 2001, 60 (1-3) :35-47
[3]   CO2 fluxes in adjacent new and permanent temperate grasslands [J].
Byrne, KA ;
Kiely, G ;
Leahy, P .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2005, 135 (1-4) :82-92
[4]  
CARTON OT, 1999, LAND SPREADING ANIMA
[5]   Analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from the average Irish milk production system [J].
Casey, JW ;
Holden, NM .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2005, 86 (01) :97-114
[6]   The relationship between greenhouse gas emissions and the intensity of milk production in Ireland [J].
Casey, JW ;
Holden, NM .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2005, 34 (02) :429-436
[7]  
CHADWICK DR, 2000, J ENVIRON QUAL, P29
[8]  
*DARDNL, 2003, COD GOOD AGR PRACT P
[9]  
*EPA, 1998, TRENDS CHALL
[10]  
*FAO UNESCO, 1974, FA UNESCO SOIL MAP W