Categorical versus continuous risk factors and the calculation of potential impact fractions

被引:161
作者
Barendregt, Jan J. [1 ]
Veerman, J. Lennert [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Populat Hlth, Herston, Qld 4006, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
DISEASE; BURDEN; OBESITY;
D O I
10.1136/jech.2009.090274
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background The potential impact fraction is a measure of effect that calculates the proportional change in disease risk after a change in the exposure of a related risk factor. Potential impact fractions are increasingly used to calculate attributable fractions when the lowest exposure is non-zero. Methods Risk-factor exposure can be expressed as a categorical or a continuous variable. For a categorical risk factor, a change in risk-factor exposure can be expressed as a change in the proportion of the population in each category ('proportions shift'). For a continuous risk factor, the change is expressed as a change in its parameters ('distribution shift'). A third method ('RR shift') takes elements of both the categorical and the continuous approach. We compare the three calculation methods using hypothetical data on BMI and an intervention that affects the obese category. Results The 'proportion shift' calculation produces nonlinear artefacts and is best avoided. The 'RR shift' and 'distribution shift' calculation require the estimation of an RR function to describe excess risk, but perform much better. Conclusion The 'proportion shift' calculation is best avoided. The 'RR shift' and 'distribution shift' calculation produce virtually the same results. For evaluating high-risk strategies, the 'RR shift' calculation is the simplest and therefore preferred. The 'distribution shift' is best suited for evaluating population strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 212
页数:4
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, DICT EPIDEMIOLOGY
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, WORLD HLTH REP
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2020, WHO Technical Report Series 1004, Annex 9, 2017: World Health Organization
[4]  
Ezatti M., 2004, COMP QUANTIFICATION
[5]   Estimates of global and regional potential health gains from reducing multiple major risk factors [J].
Ezzati, M ;
Vander Hoorn, S ;
Rodgers, A ;
Lopez, AD ;
Mathers, CD ;
Murray, CJL .
LANCET, 2003, 362 (9380) :271-280
[6]   CONCEPTUAL PROBLEMS IN THE DEFINITION AND INTERPRETATION OF ATTRIBUTABLE FRACTIONS [J].
GREENLAND, S ;
ROBINS, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1988, 128 (06) :1185-1197
[7]  
GUNNINGSCHEPERS L, 1989, HEALTH POLICY, V12, P1
[8]   Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: systematic analysis of population health data [J].
Lopez, Alan D. ;
Mathers, Colin D. ;
Ezzati, Majid ;
Jamison, Dean T. ;
Murray, Christopher J. L. .
LANCET, 2006, 367 (9524) :1747-1757
[9]  
Morgenstern H, 1982, J Community Health, V7, P292, DOI 10.1007/BF01318961
[10]   Comparative quantification of health risks: Conceptual framework and methodological issues [J].
Christopher JL Murray ;
Majid Ezzati ;
Alan D Lopez ;
Anthony Rodgers ;
Stephen Vander Hoorn .
Population Health Metrics, 1 (1)