Specialist nurse-led clinics to improve control of hypertension and hyperlipidemia in diabetes - Economic analysis of the SPLINT trial

被引:39
作者
Mason, JM
Freemantle, N
Gibson, JM
New, JP
机构
[1] Univ Durham, Sch Hlth, Wolfson Res Unit, Stockton On Tees TS17 6BH, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Dept Primary Care & Gen Practice, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[3] Hope Hosp, Dept Diabet, Salford M6 8HD, Lancs, England
关键词
D O I
10.2337/diacare.28.1.40
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE - To determine the cost-effectiveness of specialist nurse-led clinics provided to improve lipid and blood pressure control in diabetic patients receiving hospital-based care. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - A policy of targeting improved care through specialist nurse-led clinics is evaluated using a novel method, linking the cost-effectiveness of antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatments with the cost and level of behavioral change achieved by the specialist nurse-led clinics. Treatment cost-effectiveness is modeled from the U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study and Heart Protection Study treatment trials, whereas specialist nurse-led clinics are evaluated using the Specialist Nurse-Led Clinics to Improve Control of Hypertension and Hyperlipidemia in Diabetes (SPLINT) trial. RESULTS - Good lipid and blood pressure control are cost-effective treatment goals for patients with diabetes. Modeling findings from treatment trials, blood pressure lowering is estimated to be cost saving and life prolonging (-$1,400/quality-adjusted life-year [QALY]), whereas lipid-lowering is estimated to be highly cost-effective ($8,230/QALY). Investing in nurse-led clinics to help achieve these benefits imposes an addition on treatment cost-effectiveness leading to higher estimates: $4,020/QALY and $19,950/QALY, respectively. For both clinics combined, the estimated cost-effectiveness is $9,070/QALY. Using an acceptability threshold of $50,000/QALY, the likelihood that blood pressure-lowering clinics are cost-effective is 77%, lipid clinics 99%, and combined clinics 83%. CONCLUSIONS - A method is described for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of policies to change patient uptake of health care. Such policies are less attractive than treatment cost-effectiveness (which implies cost-less self-implementation). However, specialist nurse-led clinics, as an adjunct to hospital-based diabetic care, combining both lipid and blood pressure control, appear effective and likely to provide excellent value for money. Diabetes Care 28:40-46, 2005.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 46
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE RISK PROFILES [J].
ANDERSON, KM ;
ODELL, PM ;
WILSON, PWF ;
KANNEL, WB .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1991, 121 (01) :293-298
[2]   Probabilistic analysis of cost-effectiveness models: Choosing between treatment strategies for gastroesophageal reflux disease [J].
Briggs, AH ;
Goeree, R ;
Blackhouse, G ;
O'Brien, BJ .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2002, 22 (04) :290-308
[3]  
Collins R, 2002, LANCET, V360, P23, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09328-5
[4]  
*DEP HLTH, 2002, PRESCR COST AN ENGL
[5]  
*DEP HLTH, 2001, REF COSTS ENGL
[6]   A clinical decision support system for prevention of venous thromboembolism - Effect on physician behavior [J].
Durieux, P ;
Nizard, R ;
Ravaud, P ;
Mounier, N ;
Lepage, E .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 283 (21) :2816-2821
[7]   Cost-effectiveness of treating hyperlipidemia in the presence of diabetes - Who should be treated? [J].
Grover, SA ;
Coupal, L ;
Zowall, H ;
Dorais, M .
CIRCULATION, 2000, 102 (07) :722-727
[8]  
Hoerger TJ, 2002, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V287, P2542
[9]  
HULSCHER MEJ, 2003, COCHRANE LIB
[10]  
Kannel W, 1988, FRAMINGHAM STUDY EPI