High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for multiple myeloma

被引:1466
作者
Child, JA
Morgan, GJ
Davies, FE
Owen, RG
Bell, SE
Hawkins, K
Brown, J
Drayson, MT
Selby, PJ
机构
[1] Leukaemia Res Fund Unit, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Canc Res UK Clin Ctr, Acad Unit Haematol & Oncol, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Leeds, Acad Unit Epidemiol & Hlth Serv Res, No & Yorkshire Clin Trials & Res Unit, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[4] Univ Birmingham, Dept Immunol, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
D O I
10.1056/NEJMoa022340
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
BACKGROUND: High-dose therapy with supporting autologous stem-cell transplantation remains a controversial treatment for cancer. In multiple myeloma, first-line regimens incorporating high-dose therapy yield higher remission rates than do conventional-dose treatments, but evidence that this translates into improved survival is limited. METHODS: In this multicenter study, the Medical Research Council Myeloma VII Trial, we randomly assigned 407 patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma who were younger than 65 years of age to receive either standard conventional-dose combination chemotherapy or high-dose therapy and an autologous stem-cell transplant. RESULTS: Among the 401 patients who could be evaluated, the rates of complete response were higher in the intensive-therapy group than in the standard-therapy group (44 percent vs. 8 percent, P<0.001). The rates of partial response were similar (42 percent and 40 percent, respectively; P=0.72), and the rates of minimal response were lower in the intensive-therapy group than in the standard-therapy group (3 percent vs. 18 percent, P<0.001). Intention-to-treat analysis showed a higher rate of overall survival (P=0.04 by the log-rank test) and progression-free survival (P<0.001) in the intensive-therapy group than in the standard-therapy group. As compared with standard therapy, intensive treatment increased median survival by almost 1 year (54.1 months [95 percent confidence interval, 44.9 to 65.2] vs. 42.3 months [95 percent confidence interval, 33.1 to 51.6]). There was a trend toward a greater survival benefit in the group of patients with a poor prognosis, as defined by a high beta(sub 2)-microglobulin level (more than 8 mg per liter). CONCLUSIONS: High-dose therapy with autologous stem-cell rescue is an effective first-line treatment for patients with multiple myeloma who are younger than 65 years of age.
引用
收藏
页码:1875 / 1883
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]
A prospective, randomized trial of autologous bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy in multiple myeloma [J].
Attal, M ;
Harousseau, JL ;
Stoppa, AM ;
Sotto, JJ ;
Fuzibet, JG ;
Rossi, JF ;
Casassus, P ;
Maisonneuve, H ;
Facon, T ;
Ifrah, N ;
Payen, C ;
Bataille, R .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (02) :91-97
[2]
ATTAL M, 2001, P 8 INT MYEL WORKSH, P28
[3]
Superiority of tandem autologous transplantation over standard therapy for previously untreated multiple myeloma [J].
Barlogie, B ;
Jagannath, S ;
Vesole, DH ;
Naucke, S ;
Cheson, B ;
Mattox, S ;
Bracy, D ;
Salmon, S ;
Jacobson, J ;
Crowley, J ;
Tricot, G .
BLOOD, 1997, 89 (03) :789-793
[4]
Total therapy with tandem transplants for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma [J].
Barlogie, B ;
Jagannath, S ;
Desikan, KR ;
Mattox, S ;
Vesole, D ;
Siegel, D ;
Tricot, G ;
Munshi, N ;
Fassas, A ;
Singhal, S ;
Mehta, J ;
Anaissie, E ;
Dhodapkar, D ;
Naucke, S ;
Cromer, J ;
Sawyer, J ;
Epstein, J ;
Spoon, D ;
Ayers, D ;
Cheson, B ;
Crowley, J .
BLOOD, 1999, 93 (01) :55-65
[5]
Survival of multiple myeloma patients who are potential candidates for early high-dose therapy intensification/autotransplantation and who were conventionally treated [J].
Blade, J ;
SanMiguel, JF ;
Fontanillas, M ;
Alcala, A ;
Maldonado, J ;
GarciaConde, J ;
Conde, E ;
ConzalezBrito, G ;
Moro, MJ ;
Escudero, ML ;
Trujillo, J ;
Pascual, A ;
Rozman, C ;
Estape, J ;
Montserrat, E .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 14 (07) :2167-2173
[6]
Blade J, 2001, BLOOD, V98, p815A
[7]
Blade Joan, 1998, British Journal of Haematology, V102, P1115, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1998.00930.x
[8]
CAVO M, 2001, P 8 INT MYEL WORKSH, P29
[9]
EVOLVING STRATEGIES FOR THE TREATMENT OF MYELOMATOSIS [J].
CHILD, JA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 1994, 88 (04) :672-678
[10]
*COCHR COLL, 2000, REV MAN REVM VERS 4