Tools & Techniques - Statistics: Propensity score techniques

被引:20
作者
da Costa, Bruno R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gahl, Brigitta [4 ,5 ]
Jueni, Peter [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Inst Social & Prevent Med, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
[2] Univ Bern, CTU Bern, Dept Clin Res, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
[3] Florida Int Univ, Dept Phys Therapy, Nicole Wertheim Coll Nursing & Hlth Sci, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[4] Univ Hosp Bern, Inselspital, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
[5] Univ Bern, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
关键词
AORTIC-VALVE-REPLACEMENT; BIAS; TRANSCATHETER; ADJUSTMENT; VARIABLES; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.4244/EIJV10I6A130
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Propensity score (PS) techniques are useful if the number of potential confounding pretreatment variables is large and the number of analysed outcome events is rather small so that conventional multivariable adjustment is hardly feasible. Only pretreatment characteristics should be chosen to derive PS, and only when they are probably associated with outcome. A careful visual inspection of PS will help to identify areas of no or minimal overlap, which suggests residual confounding, and trimming of the data according to the distribution of PS will help to minimise residual confounding. Standardised differences in pretreatment characteristics provide a useful check of the success of the PS technique employed. As with conventional multivariable adjustment, PS techniques cannot account for confounding variables that are not or are only imperfectly measured, and no PS technique is a substitute for an adequately designed randomised trial.
引用
收藏
页码:761 / 767
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   A Tutorial and Case Study in Propensity Score Analysis: An Application to Estimating the Effect of In-Hospital Smoking Cessation Counseling on Mortality [J].
Austin, Peter C. .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2011, 46 (01) :119-151
[2]   Report Card on Propensity-Score Matching in the Cardiology Literature From 2004 to 2006 A Systematic Review [J].
Austin, Peter C. .
CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES, 2008, 1 (01) :62-67
[3]   The method of probits [J].
Bliss, C. I. .
SCIENCE, 1934, 79 (2037) :38-39
[4]   A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF SEVERAL SMOOTHING METHODS IN DENSITY-ESTIMATION [J].
CAO, R ;
CUEVAS, A ;
MANTEIGA, WG .
COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 1994, 17 (02) :153-176
[5]   EFFECTIVENESS OF ADJUSTMENT BY SUBCLASSIFICATION IN REMOVING BIAS IN OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES [J].
COCHRAN, WG .
BIOMETRICS, 1968, 24 (02) :295-&
[6]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, VSecond
[7]  
Harrel FE., 2001, REGRESSION MODELING
[8]   An overview of the objectives of and the approaches to propensity score analyses [J].
Heinze, Georg ;
Jueni, Peter .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2011, 32 (14) :1704-1708
[9]   A brief survey of bandwidth selection for density estimation [J].
Jones, MC ;
Marron, JS ;
Sheather, SJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 91 (433) :401-407
[10]   Systematic reviews in health care -: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials [J].
Jüni, P ;
Altman, DG ;
Egger, M .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 323 (7303) :42-46