A comparison of three diagnostic techniques for malaria:: a rapid diagnostic test (NOW® Malaria), PCR and microscopy

被引:31
作者
Gatti, S.
Gramegna, M.
Bisoffi, Z.
Raglio, A.
Gulletta, M.
Klersy, C.
Bruno, A.
Maserati, R.
Madama, S.
Scaglia, M.
机构
[1] IRCCS, Policlin San Matteo, Parasitol Lab, Virol Serv, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
[2] Clonit SrL, I-20139 Milan, Italy
[3] Sacro Cuore Hosp, Trop Dis Unit, I-37024 Negrar, Italy
[4] Osped Riuniti Bergamo, Lab Microbiol & Virol, I-24128 Bergamo, Italy
[5] Univ Brescia, Spedali Civili, Infect & Trop Dis Inst, I-25125 Brescia, Italy
[6] IRCCS, Policlin San Matteo, Biometry & Clin Epidemiol Serv, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
[7] Univ Pavia, Policlin San Matteo, Lab Clin Parasitol, Dept Infect Dis,IRCCS, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
来源
ANNALS OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND PARASITOLOGY | 2007年 / 101卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1179/136485907X156997
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Malaria is a common, life-threatening infection in endemic tropical areas and one that presents a diagnostic challenge to laboratories in most non-endemic countries. A rapid and accurate diagnosis is a prerequisite for effective treatment, especially for the potentially fatal cases of Plasmodium falciparum infection. In the present, multi-centre study, the performances of a rapid diagnostic test (NOW Malaria) and several, commercial, PCR-based assays (AMS61, AMS42, AMS43, AMS44 and AMS45) were compared against the results of microscopical examination of bloodsmears (the current 'gold standard'). The subjects were either non-European immigrants (N=135) or international travellers (N=171). There was good concordance between the results of all the detection methods, with kappa values of > 0.8. Although the NOW Malaria rapid test was both sensitive (100%) and specific (100%) in detecting P. falciparum infections, it was less specific (93.1%) and sensitive (90.7%) in identifying the other Plasmodium species. The results from the AMS61 assay, designed to detect any malarial infection, generally parallelled those of the microscopy (kappa=0.89), giving a specificity of 98.2% and a sensitivity of 91.0%. Although the use of species-specific molecular primers to identify pure infections with P. falciparum and P. vivax gave results that were in good agreement with those of the microscopy, the subjects who had apparently pure infections with P. ovale or P. malariae were always found PCR-negative. Compared with the standard microscopy, both the NOW Malaria test and the PCR-based assays were therefore poor at identifying mixed infections. The NOW Malaria test and the PCR-based assays clearly need to be improved, particularly for the correct identification of infections with Plasmodium spp. other than P. falciparum, including mixed infections. For now, expert microscopy must remain the mainstay of the laboratory diagnosis of malaria.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 204
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Genetic diversity of Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2 (PfHRP2) and its effect on the performance of PfHRP2-based rapid diagnostic tests [J].
Baker, J ;
McCarthy, J ;
Gatton, M ;
Kyle, DE ;
Belizario, V ;
Luchavez, J ;
Bell, D ;
Cheng, Q .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2005, 192 (05) :870-877
[2]   Field and laboratory comparative evaluation of ten rapid malaria diagnostic tests [J].
Craig, MH ;
Bredenkamp, BL ;
Williams, CHV ;
Rossouw, EJ ;
Kelly, VJ ;
Kleinschmidt, I ;
Martineau, A ;
Henry, GFJ .
TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2002, 96 (03) :258-265
[3]   Real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for the rapid detection and characterization of chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria in returned travelers [J].
Farcas, GA ;
Soeller, R ;
Zhong, K ;
Zahirieh, A ;
Kain, KC .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2006, 42 (05) :622-627
[4]   Problem pathogens: prevention of malaria in travellers [J].
Franco-Paredes, C ;
Santos-Preciado, JI .
LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2006, 6 (03) :139-149
[5]   Multicentre study, in patients with imported malaria, on the sensitivity and specificity of a dipstick test (ICT Malaria P.f./P.v.™) compared with expert microscopy [J].
Gatti, S ;
Bernuzzi, AM ;
Bisoffi, Z ;
Raglio, A ;
Gulletta, M ;
Scaglia, M .
ANNALS OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND PARASITOLOGY, 2002, 96 (01) :15-18
[6]   Comparison of three antigen detection tests for diagnosis and follow-up of falciparum malaria in travellers returning to Berlin, Germany [J].
Grobusch, MP ;
Hänscheid, T ;
Göbels, K ;
Slevogt, H ;
Zoller, T ;
Rögler, G ;
Teichmann, D .
PARASITOLOGY RESEARCH, 2003, 89 (05) :354-357
[7]   Rapid immunochromatographic malarial antigen detection unreliable for detecting Plasmodium malariae and Plasmodium ovale [J].
Grobusch, MP ;
Hänscheid, T ;
Zoller, T ;
Jelinek, T ;
Burchard, GD .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2002, 21 (11) :818-820
[8]  
Haditsch M, 2004, Travel Med Infect Dis, V2, P149, DOI 10.1016/j.tmaid.2004.03.001
[9]   Current strategies to avoid misdiagnosis of malaria [J].
Hänscheid, T .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2003, 9 (06) :497-504
[10]   Comparison of two commercial assays with expert microscopy for confirmation of symptomatically diagnosed malaria [J].
Iqbal, J ;
Khalid, N ;
Hira, PR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2002, 40 (12) :4675-4678