Hypnosis and event-related potential correlates of error processing in a stroop-type paradigm: a test of the frontal hypothesis

被引:64
作者
Kaiser, J [1 ]
Barker, R [1 ]
Haenschel, C [1 ]
Baldeweg, T [1 ]
Gruzelier, JH [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Sch Med, Dept Psychol & Cognit Neurosci, Lab Neuropsychophysiol, London W6 8RF, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
hypnosis; error negativity; error positivity; stroop paradigm; frontal function;
D O I
10.1016/S0167-8760(97)00055-X
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A model of frontal inhibition in hypnosis was elucidated by examining with cortical evoked potentials error negativity and positivity in 23 low versus medium/high hypnotisables during a perceptual task which included trials with conflicting stimulus information. In susceptible subjects the number of correct responses was found to be smaller for trials with incongruent stimulus information with hypnosis when compared with baseline. While the early negative wave to incorrect responses tended to be higher in susceptible subjects, this wave was no longer followed by a late positivity, posited to reflect a failure to process further the error-related information. The results with hypnosis are interpreted as a failure of context updating without a global deficit in supervisory attention. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 222
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   INVESTIGATIONS OF THE FUNCTIONAL-ANATOMY OF ATTENTION USING THE STROOP TEST [J].
BENCH, CJ ;
FRITH, CD ;
GRASBY, PM ;
FRISTON, KJ ;
PAULESU, E ;
FRACKOWIAK, RSJ ;
DOLAN, RJ .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1993, 31 (09) :907-922
[2]  
Crawford H.J., 1992, CONT HYPNOSIS RES, P227
[3]   ENHANCED VISUAL MEMORY DURING HYPNOSIS AS MEDIATED BY HYPNOTIC RESPONSIVENESS AND COGNITIVE STRATEGIES [J].
CRAWFORD, HJ ;
ALLEN, SN .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1983, 112 (04) :662-685
[4]   SUSTAINED ATTENTIONAL AND DISATTENTIONAL ABILITIES - DIFFERENCES BETWEEN LOW AND HIGHLY HYPNOTIZABLE PERSONS [J].
CRAWFORD, HJ ;
BROWN, AM ;
MOON, CE .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 102 (04) :534-543
[5]   EFFECTS OF HYPNOSIS ON REGIONAL CEREBRAL BLOOD-FLOW DURING ISCHEMIC PAIN WITH AND WITHOUT SUGGESTED HYPNOTIC ANALGESIA [J].
CRAWFORD, HJ ;
GUR, RC ;
SKOLNICK, B ;
GUR, RE ;
BENSON, DM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1993, 15 (03) :181-195
[6]   Auditory event-related potentials while ignoring tone stimuli: Attentional differences reflected in stimulus intensity and latency responses in low and highly hypnotizable persons [J].
Crawford, HJ ;
Corby, JC ;
Kopell, BS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 1996, 85 (1-2) :57-70
[7]   LOCALIZATION OF A NEURAL SYSTEM FOR ERROR-DETECTION AND COMPENSATION [J].
DEHAENE, S ;
POSNER, MI ;
TUCKER, DM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1994, 5 (05) :303-305
[8]  
Donchin E, 1988, BEHAVIORAL BRAIN SCI, V11, P406
[9]   EFFECTS OF CROSSMODAL DIVIDED ATTENTION ON LATE ERP COMPONENTS .2. ERROR PROCESSING IN CHOICE REACTION TASKS [J].
FALKENSTEIN, M ;
HOHNSBEIN, J ;
HOORMANN, J ;
BLANKE, L .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 78 (06) :447-455
[10]  
FALKENSTEIN M, 1995, PERSPECTIVES EVENT S, V44, P287