Initial clinical experience with ambulatory use of an implantable atrial defibrillator for conversion of atrial fibrillation

被引:49
作者
Daoud, EG
Timmermans, C
Fellows, C
Hoyt, R
Lemery, R
Dawson, K
Ayers, GM
机构
[1] Riverside Methodist Hosp, Columbus, OH 43214 USA
[2] Acad Hosp Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Virginia Mason Med Ctr, Seattle, WA 98101 USA
[4] Iowa Heart Inst, Des Moines, IA USA
[5] Rhode Isl Hosp, Providence, RI USA
[6] InControl Guidant Inc, Redmond, WA USA
[7] InControl Guidant Inc, St Paul, MN USA
关键词
defibrillation; shock; cardioversion; outpatient therapy;
D O I
10.1161/01.CIR.102.12.1407
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background-A recent study has shown that the implantable atrial defibrillator can restore sinus rhythm in patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation when therapy was delivered under physician observation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ambulatory use of the implantable atrial defibrillator, Methods and Results-An atrial defibrillator was implanted in 105 patients (75 men; mean age, 59+/-12 years) with recurrent, symptomatic, drug-refractory atrial fibrillation, After successful 3-month testing, patients could transition to ambulatory delivery of shock therapy. Patients completed questionnaires regarding shock therapy discomfort and therapy satisfaction using a 10-point visual-analog scale (1 represented "not at all," 10 represented "extremely") after each treated episode of atrial fibrillation, During a mean follow-up of 11.7 months, 48 of 105 patients satisfied criteria for transition and received therapy for 275 episodes of atrial fibrillation, Overall shock therapy efficacy was 90% with 1.6+/-1.2 shocks delivered per episode (median, 1). Patients rated shock discomfort as 5.2+/-2.4 for successful therapy and 4.2+/-2.2 for unsuccessful therapy (P>0.05), The satisfaction score was higher for successful versus unsuccessful therapy (3.4+/-3.3 versus 8.7+/-1.3, P<0.05). There was no ventricular proarrhythmia observed throughout the course of this study. Conclusions-Ambulatory use of an implantable atrial defibrillator can safely and successfully convert most episodes of atrial fibrillation, often requiring only a single shock. Successful therapy is associated with high satisfaction and only moderate discomfort.
引用
收藏
页码:1407 / 1413
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   VENTRICULAR PROARRHYTHMIC EFFECTS OF VENTRICULAR CYCLE LENGTH AND SHOCK STRENGTH IN A SHEEP MODEL OF TRANSVENOUS ATRIAL DEFIBRILLATION [J].
AYERS, GM ;
ALFERNESS, CA ;
ILINA, M ;
WAGNER, DO ;
SIROKMAN, WA ;
ADAMS, JM ;
GRIFFIN, JC .
CIRCULATION, 1994, 89 (01) :413-422
[2]  
Ayers Gregory M., 1997, P475
[3]  
BIALY D, 1992, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V19, P41
[4]   Antiarrhythmic drug therapy in the management of atrial fibrillation [J].
Ganz, LI ;
Antman, EM .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 8 (10) :1175-1189
[5]  
Jung W, 1998, J CARDIOVASC ELECTR, V9, pS177
[6]   Multicenter low energy transvenous atrial defibrillation (XAD) trial results in different subsets of atrial fibrillation [J].
Levy, S ;
Ricard, P ;
Lau, CP ;
Lok, NS ;
Camm, AJ ;
Murgatroyd, FD ;
Jordaens, LJ ;
Kappenberger, LJ ;
Brugada, P ;
Ripley, KL .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1997, 29 (04) :750-755
[7]   Clinical shock tolerability and effect of different right atrial electrode locations on efficacy of low energy human transvenous atrial defibrillation using an implantable lead system [J].
Lok, NS ;
Lau, CP ;
Tse, HF ;
Ayers, GM .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1997, 30 (05) :1324-1330
[8]  
LOWN B, 1962, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V182, P548
[9]  
Maglio C., 1998, PACING CLIN ELECTROP, V21, P839
[10]  
MIDDLEKAUFF HR, 1995, ARCH INTERN MED, V155, P913