Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide monotherapy compared with glimepiride in East-Asian patients with type 2 diabetes in a multicentre, double-blind, randomized, parallel-arm, active comparator, phase III trial

被引:49
作者
Chen, Yu Hong [1 ,5 ]
Huang, Chien-Ning [2 ]
Cho, Young Min [3 ]
Li, Pengfei [4 ]
Gu, Liqun [5 ]
Wang, Feng [5 ]
Yang, Jun
Wang, Wei Qing [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Ruijin Hosp, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Chung Shan Med Univ Hosp, Taichung, Taiwan
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Takeda Dev Ctr Asia, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] Lilly Suzhou Pharmaceut Co Ltd, Shanghai 200040, Peoples R China
关键词
dulaglutide; glimepiride; glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist; HbA1c; type; 2; diabetes; ONCE-WEEKLY DULAGLUTIDE; PEPTIDE-1 RECEPTOR AGONIST; DRUG-NAIVE PATIENTS; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; GLP-1; ANALOG; OPEN-LABEL; METFORMIN; LIRAGLUTIDE; EXENATIDE; SITAGLIPTIN;
D O I
10.1111/dom.13340
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Aims: To compare the efficacy and safety of once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist dulaglutide 1.5 and 0.75 mg with glimepiride in East-Asian patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Materials and methods: In this phase III, multinational, multicentre, double-blind, randomized, parallel-arm, 26-week study, patients with inadequate glycaemic control were randomized 1:1:1 to once-weekly dulaglutide 1.5 or 0.75 mg or daily glimepiride (1-3 mg/d). The primary endpoint was assessment of the non-inferiority of dulaglutide (1.5 mg), as measured by change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), compared with glimepiride using a 0.4% non-inferiority margin. Results: A total of 737 patients were randomized (dulaglutide 1.5 mg, n = 244; dulaglutide 0.75 mg, n = 248; glimepiride, n = 245). At week 26, both doses of dulaglutide were non-inferior and also superior to glimepiride for HbA1c reduction from baseline with a least squares mean difference of -6.34 mmol/mol (95% confidence interval [CI] -8.31, -4.26) or -0.58% (95% CI -0.76, -0.39) for dulaglutide 1.5 mg and -3.50 mmol/mol (95% CI -5.47, -1.42) or -0.32% (95% CI -0.50, -0.13) for dulaglutide 0.75 mg (P < .001). A greater proportion of patients in the dulaglutide 1.5 mg group achieved the HbA1c target of <53 mmol/mol (<7.0%) compared with the glimepiride group (74.1% vs 57.4%; P < .001). The mean body weight decreased (P < .005) and total hypoglycaemia rates were lower (P < .001) in the dulaglutide groups compared with the glimepiride group. The most common drug-related adverse events in both dulaglutide groups (>= 5% of patients) included diarrhoea, nausea, increased lipase, decreased appetite, abdominal distension and vomiting. Conclusions:Dulaglutide (both doses) demonstrated superior glycaemic control vs glimepiride, with a favourable tolerability and safety profile in East-Asian patients with T2D.
引用
收藏
页码:2121 / 2130
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]
Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Receptor Signaling in Acinar Cells Causes Growth-Dependent Release of Pancreatic Enzymes [J].
Albrechtsen, Nicolai J. Wewer ;
Albrechtsen, Reidar ;
Bremholm, Lasse ;
Svendsen, Berit ;
Kuhre, Rune E. ;
Poulsen, Steen S. ;
Christiansen, Charlotte B. ;
Jensen, Elisa P. ;
Janus, Charlotte ;
Hilsted, Linda ;
Deacon, Carolyn F. ;
Hartmann, Bolette ;
Holst, Jens J. .
CELL REPORTS, 2016, 17 (11) :2845-2856
[2]
[Anonymous], 1997, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V277, P925
[3]
[Anonymous], 2017, TRUL DUL INJ
[4]
Once-weekly dulaglutide versus bedtime insulin glargine, both in combination with prandial insulin lispro, in patients with type 2 diabetes (AWARD-4): a randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority study [J].
Blonde, Lawrence ;
Jendle, Johan ;
Gross, Jorge ;
Woo, Vincent ;
Jiang, Honghua ;
Fahrbach, Jessie L. ;
Milicevic, Zvonko .
LANCET, 2015, 385 (9982) :2057-2066
[5]
Lower baseline glycemia reduces apparent oral agent glucose-lowering efficacy - A meta-regression analysis [J].
Bloomgarden, Zachary T. ;
Dodis, Regina ;
Viscoli, Catherine M. ;
Holmboe, Eric S. ;
Inzucchi, Silvio E. .
DIABETES CARE, 2006, 29 (09) :2137-2139
[6]
Baseline differences in A1C explain apparent differences in efficacy of sitagliptin, rosiglitazone and pioglitazone [J].
Chapell, R. ;
Gould, A. L. ;
Alexander, C. M. .
DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2009, 11 (11) :1009-1016
[7]
Type 2 diabetes [J].
Chatterjee, Sudesna ;
Khunti, Kamlesh ;
Davies, Melanie J. .
LANCET, 2017, 389 (10085) :2239-2251
[8]
Davies Melanie J, 2002, Curr Med Res Opin, V18 Suppl 1, ps22, DOI 10.1185/030079902125000200
[9]
Mixtures of multiple testing procedures for gatekeeping applications in clinical trials [J].
Dmitrienko, Alex ;
Tamhane, Ajit C. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2011, 30 (13) :1473-1488
[10]
Drugs, 2017, GLIM IND US