Inverse treatment planning with adaptively evolving voxel-dependent penalty scheme

被引:32
作者
Yong, Y [1 ]
Lei, X [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
IMRT; inverse planning; dose optimization; objective function; tradeoff;
D O I
10.1118/1.1799311
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
In current inverse planning algorithms it is common to treat all voxels within a target or sensitive structure equally and use structure specific prescriptions and weighting factors as system parameters. In reality, the voxels within a structure are not identical in complying with their dosimetric goals and there exists strong intrastructural competition. Inverse planning objective function should not only balance the competing objectives of different structures but also that of the individual voxels in various structures. In this work we propose to model the intrastructural tradeoff through the modulation of voxel-dependent importance factors and deal with the challenging problem of how to obtain a sensible set of importance factors with a manageable amount of computing. Instead of letting the values of voxel-dependent importance to vary freely during the search process, an adaptive algorithm, in which the importance factors were tied to the local radiation doses through a heuristically constructed relation, was developed. It is shown that the approach is quite general and the EUD-based optimization is a special case of the proposed framework. The new planning tool was applied to study a hypothetical phantom case and a prostate case. Comparison of the results with that obtained using conventional inverse planning technique with structure specific importance factors indicated that the dose distributions from the conventional inverse planning are at best suboptimal and can be significantly improved with the help of the proposed nonuniform penalty scheme. (C) 2004 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:2839 / 2844
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   EUD but not QED [J].
Amols, HI ;
Ling, CC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 52 (01) :1-2
[2]   Optimized planning using physical objectives and constraints [J].
Bortfeld, T .
SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 1999, 9 (01) :20-+
[3]  
BORTFELD T, 2002, ICRO M MOND ED, P251
[4]   Intensity-modulated radiotherapy: Current status and issues of interest [J].
Boyer, AL ;
Butler, EB ;
DiPetrillo, TA ;
Engler, MJ ;
Fraass, B ;
Grant, W ;
Ling, CC ;
Low, DA ;
Mackie, TR ;
Mohan, R ;
Purdy, JA ;
Roach, M ;
Rosenman, JG ;
Verhey, LJ ;
Wong, JW ;
Cumberlin, RL ;
Stone, H ;
Palta, JR .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 51 (04) :880-914
[5]   Optimized radiation therapy based on radiobiological objectives [J].
Brahme, A .
SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 1999, 9 (01) :35-47
[6]   A deterministic iterative least-squares algorithm for beam weight optimization in conformal radiotherapy [J].
Chen, Y ;
Michalski, D ;
Houser, C ;
Galvin, JM .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2002, 47 (10) :1647-1658
[7]   IMRT dose shaping with regionally variable penalty scheme [J].
Cotrutz, C ;
Xing, L .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (04) :544-551
[8]   Using voxel-dependent importance factors for interactive DVH-based dose optimization [J].
Cotrutz, C ;
Xing, L .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2002, 47 (10) :1659-1669
[9]   Multiple local minima in radiotherapy optimization problems with dose-volume constraints [J].
Deasy, JO .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 24 (07) :1157-1161
[10]   An algorithm for systematic selection of beam directions for IMRT [J].
Gaede, S ;
Wong, E ;
Rasmussen, H .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (02) :376-388