Alternate furrow irrigation for maize production in an arid area

被引:204
作者
Kang, SZ
Liang, ZS
Pan, YH
Shi, PZ
Zhang, JH [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Dept Biol, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Wuwei Inst Water Conservancy, Wuwei, Gansu, Peoples R China
[3] Minist Water Resources, Yangling, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Soil & Water Conservat, Yangling, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[5] NW Agr Univ, Inst Agr Soil & Water Engn, Yangling, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
关键词
irrigation; soil drying; water use efficiency; maize (Zea mays);
D O I
10.1016/S0378-3774(00)00072-X
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
A new irrigation method for maize production was designed and tested for yield and water use efficiency (WUE). A field experiment was conducted in an arid area, with seasonal rainfall of 80 mm, over 2 years (1997 and 1998). Irrigation was applied through furrows in three ways: alternate furrow irrigation (An), fixed furrow irrigation (FFI), and conventional furrow irrigation (CFI). AFI means that one of the two neighboring furrows was alternately irrigated during consecutive watering. FFI means that irrigation was fixed to one of the two neighboring furrows. CFI was the conventional way where every furrow was irrigated during each watering. Each irrigation method was further divided into three sub-treatments with different irrigation amounts: 45, 30 and 22.5 mm water at each application. Results showed that root development was significantly enhanced by AFT treatment. Primary root numbers, total root dry weight, and root density were all higher in AFI than in FFI and CFI treatments. Less irrigation significantly reduced the total root dry weight and plant height in both FFI and CFI treatments but not as substantially with AFI treatments. The most surprising result was that AFI maintained high grain yield with up to 50% reduction in irrigation amount, while FFI and CFI all showed a substantial decrease in yield with reduced irrigation. As a result, WUE for irrigated water was substantially increased. We conclude that AFI is a way to save water in arid areas where maize production relies heavily on repeated irrigation. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 274
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Bradford KJ, 1982, PHYSL PLANT ECOLOGY, V12, P263, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-68150-9_10
[2]  
Cowan I.R., 1982, Encyclopedia of Plant Ecophysiology, New Ser, V12, P589, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-68150-9_
[3]  
DAVIES WJ, 1991, ANNU REV PLANT PHYS, V42, P55, DOI 10.1146/annurev.pp.42.060191.000415
[4]  
Dry PR, 1995, P 9 AUSTR WIN IND TE
[5]  
FULLER P, 1997, WINE IND J, V12, P155
[6]   ALTERNATE-FURROW IRRIGATION FOR SOYBEAN PRODUCTION [J].
GRATEROL, YE ;
EISENHAUER, DE ;
ELMORE, RW .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 1993, 24 (02) :133-145
[7]   VARIANCE OF WATER ADVANCE IN WIDE-SPACED FURROW IRRIGATION [J].
HODGES, ME ;
STONE, JF ;
GARTON, JE ;
WEEKS, DL .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 1989, 16 (1-2) :5-13
[8]  
Jones H. G., 1980, Adaptation of plants to water and high temperature stress., P353
[9]  
KANG S, 1997, CHIN AGR RES ARID AR, V15, P1
[10]  
KANG S, 1996, J HYDRAULIC ENG, V5, P9