REACH HEIGHT AND JUMP DISPLACEMENT: IMPLICATIONS FOR STANDARDIZATION OF REACH DETERMINATION

被引:27
作者
Ferreira, Lucas C. [1 ]
Schilling, Brian K. [1 ]
Weiss, Lawrence W. [1 ]
Fry, Andrew C. [2 ]
Chiu, Loren Z. F. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Memphis, Exercise Neuromech Lab, Memphis, TN 38152 USA
[2] Univ Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[3] Univ Alberta, Neuromusculoskeletal Mech Res Program, Edmonton, AB, Canada
关键词
vertical jump; standing reach; impulse momentum; flight time; FOOTBALL PLAYING ABILITY; VERTICAL JUMP; PERFORMANCE; POWER; STRENGTH; PLAYERS;
D O I
10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d54a25
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
040301 [体育人文社会学];
摘要
Ferreira, LC, Schilling, BK, Weiss, LW, Fry, AC, and Chiu, LZF. Reach height and jump displacement: implications for standardization of reach determination. J Strength Cond Res 24(6): 1596-1601, 2010-Vertical jump performance is often assessed using jump-and-reach tests. The exact procedure used for determining standing reach height and jump height has a large effect on the resultant displacement. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the influence of 4 methods of standing reach height measurement and Vertec (TM) jump height measurement against 2 force plate methods of jump displacement determination (impulse and flight-time methods). Fifteen men with various training backgrounds performed 2 each of countermovement, restricted (no arm swing) and static start vertical jumps. Reach height was determined using 4 methods; either a 1- or overlapped 2-hand reach, flat footed or with plantar flexion. All jumps were performed on a force platform. The best jump of each type based on Vertec (TM) displacement was used for analysis. Repeated-measures of analysis of variance for each jump type was used for analysis with Bonferroni post hoc for pairwise comparisons of jump measurement style. All jump displacements for similar types were significantly intercorrelated with a minimum r-value of 0.84. Impulse vs. flight time was the only pairwise comparison of measurement type for which similar values were noted. The one-hand reach with plantar flexion was the method of reach that was closest to the impulse and flight-time methods, and thus should be the preferred choice when using jump-and-reach tests to determine jump displacement. In all cases, the Vertec (TM) overestimates the displacement of the COM based on force plate methods. When comparing groups of individuals from different data sets, one must consider both the method of reach height (if performed) and jump displacement to make valid comparisons. If plantar flexion with a 1-hand reach is not used during reach measurement, jump displacement will be erroneously high.
引用
收藏
页码:1596 / 1601
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
Aragon-Vargas L. F., 2000, Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, V4, P215, DOI 10.1207/S15327841MPEE0404_2
[2]
Barker M., 1993, Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, V7, P224, DOI DOI 10.1519/00124278-199311000-00007
[3]
Barnes JL, 2007, J STRENGTH COND RES, V21, P1192
[4]
Becker L., 2009, EFFECT SIZE CALCULAT
[5]
Becker L., 2000, Effect Size Calculators
[6]
The relationship between vertical jump power estimates and weightlifting ability: A field-test approach [J].
Carlock, JM ;
Smith, SL ;
Hartman, MJ ;
Morris, RT ;
Ciroslan, DA ;
Pierce, KC ;
Newton, RU ;
Harman, EA ;
Sands, WA ;
Stone, MH .
JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2004, 18 (03) :534-539
[7]
Chimera NJ, 2004, J ATHL TRAINING, V39, P24
[8]
Cronin JB, 2005, J STRENGTH COND RES, V19, P349
[9]
Davis DS, 2006, J STRENGTH COND RES, V20, P136
[10]
Fatouros IG, 2000, J STRENGTH COND RES, V14, P470