Using the Platelet Function Analyzer-100 for monitoring aspirin therapy

被引:16
作者
Poulsen, Tina Svenstrup
Mickley, Hans
Korsholm, Lars
Licht, Peter Bjorn
Haghfelt, Torben
Jorgensen, Bo
机构
[1] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
[2] Univ So Denmark, Dept Stat, Odense, Denmark
[3] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
[4] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept KKA, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.thromres.2006.08.010
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: The aim of the study was to evaluate the test characteristics of the Platelet Function Analyzer-100 (PFA-100) in patients treated with aspirin. Methods and results: The study consisted of two sub-studies. In study 1, 10 patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) and 10 controls had platelet function assessed by optical platelet aggregation and the PFA-100 method in two 5-week periods. Patients with IHD were treated with aspirin 150 mg/day (first 5-week period), and 300 mg/day (second 5-week period), whereas the controls only received aspirin (150 mg/day) during the second 5-week period. From the results of study 1, we found that a cut-off value for the PFA-100 collagen/epinephrine cartridge <165 s identified patients not taking aspirin (sensitivity 0.91, specificity 1.00). A good agreement between the PFA-100 method and optical platelet aggregation was found. Within-subject variation for the PFA-100 collagen /epinephrine cartridge was 28%, as compared to +/- 17% for the optical platelet aggregation. Study 2 included 298 aspirin treated patients who were admitted with symptoms suggestive of an acute myocardial infarction. Platelet function was assessed in duplicate by the PFA-100 collagen /epinephrine cartridge, and a 95% Limit of Agreement interval at [-65%, 65%] indicated a limited precision. Conclusion: We defined a cut-off value below which patients not taking aspirin can be identified. However, due to imprecision of the PFA-100 method repeated duplicate assessment of the collagen/epinephrine Closure Time is recommended. (C) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 172
页数:12
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Antiplatelet effect of aspirin in patients with cerebrovascular disease [J].
Alberts, MJ ;
Bergman, DL ;
Molner, E ;
Jovanovic, BD ;
Ushiwata, I ;
Teruya, J .
STROKE, 2004, 35 (01) :175-178
[2]  
Baigent C, 2002, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V324, P71, DOI 10.1136/bmj.324.7329.71
[3]   Measuring agreement in method comparison studies [J].
Bland, JM ;
Altman, DG .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 1999, 8 (02) :135-160
[4]  
Boysen G, 1982, Ugeskr Laeger, V144, P1217
[5]   In vitro aspirin resistance detected by PFA-100™ closure time:: pivotal role of plasma von Willebrand factor [J].
Chakroun, T ;
Gerotziafas, G ;
Robert, F ;
Lecrubier, C ;
Samama, MM ;
Hatmi, M ;
Elalamy, I .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2004, 124 (01) :80-85
[6]   Detection of aspirin resistance by PFA-100: Prevalence and aspirin compliance in patients with chronic stable angina [J].
Crowe, B ;
Abbas, S ;
Meany, B ;
de Haan, J ;
Cahill, MR .
SEMINARS IN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS, 2005, 31 (04) :420-425
[7]   Aspirin-resistant thromboxane biosynthesis and the risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death in patients at high risk for cardiovascular events [J].
Eikelboom, JW ;
Hirsh, J ;
Weitz, JI ;
Johnston, M ;
Yi, Q ;
Yusuf, S .
CIRCULATION, 2002, 105 (14) :1650-1655
[8]   Monitoring acetylsalicylic acid effects with the platelet function analyzer PFA-100 [J].
Feuring, M ;
Schultz, A ;
Losel, R ;
Wehling, M .
SEMINARS IN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS, 2005, 31 (04) :411-415
[9]   A prospective, blinded determination of the natural history of aspirin resistance among stable patients with cardiovascular disease [J].
Gum, PA ;
Kottke-Marchant, K ;
Welsh, PA ;
White, J ;
Topol, EJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 41 (06) :961-965
[10]   Profile and prevalence of aspirin resistance in patients with cardiovascular disease [J].
Gum, PA ;
Kottke-Marchant, K ;
Poggio, EC ;
Gurm, H ;
Welsh, PA ;
Brooks, L ;
Sapp, SK ;
Topol, EJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 88 (03) :230-235