Colonoscopy: practice variation among 69 hospital-based endoscopists

被引:93
作者
Cotton, PB
Connor, P
McGee, D
Jowell, P
Nickl, N
Schutz, S
Leung, J
Lee, J
Libby, E
机构
[1] Med Univ S Carolina, Ctr Digest Dis, Charleston, SC 29426 USA
[2] Med Univ S Carolina, Dept Biometry & Epidemiol, Charleston, SC 29426 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA
[4] Univ Kentucky, Lexington, KY USA
[5] David Grant Med Ctr, Travis AFB, CA USA
[6] Tufts Univ New England Med Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[7] Univ Calif Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mge.2003.121
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The medical profession, payers, and patients are interested increasingly in the quality of endoscopic procedures, including colonoscopy. The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy has recommended "report cards" by which endoscopists may keep track of certain key elements of their practice including indications, findings, duration, technical end points, complications, and patient satisfaction. Methods: The GI-Trac endoscopy reporting database includes many of the data points recommended by ASGE for report cards. Seven hospital centers in North America have been collecting data prospectively for varying periods since 1994. These data were aggregated and analyzed by individual endoscopist. A total of 69 endoscopists performed 17,868 colonoscopies. Results: Twelve percent of the endoscopists reported that more than 20% of procedures they performed were completely normal. The average time taken by 27% of endoscopists was more than 40 minutes (without trainees involved), and only 55% achieved a cecal intubation rate of over 90%; for 9% the rate was less than 80%. Complication rates were too low for individual comparisons. Conclusion: These data provide an idea of colonoscopy performance by individual endoscopists in mainly academic centers. Incorporating all recommended data elements in future reporting databases will contribute to meaningful bench marking and to quality improvement efforts.
引用
收藏
页码:352 / 357
页数:6
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Gastrintest Endosc
[2]   New occurrence and recurrence of neoplasms within 5 years of a screening colonoscopy [J].
Avidan, B ;
Sonnenberg, A ;
Schnell, TG ;
Leya, J ;
Metz, A ;
Sontag, SJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2002, 97 (06) :1524-1529
[3]   Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. [J].
Birkmeyer, JD ;
Siewers, AE ;
Finlayson, EVA ;
Stukel, TA ;
Lucas, FL ;
Batista, I ;
Welch, HG ;
Wennberg, DE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (15) :1128-1137
[4]  
Bowles CJA, 2001, GUT, V48, pA10
[5]  
*BRIT SOC GASTR, 2001, GUID TRAIN APPR ASS
[6]   Training to competence in gastrointestinal endoscopy: A plea for continuous measuring of objective end points [J].
Cass, OW .
ENDOSCOPY, 1999, 31 (09) :751-754
[7]  
COHEN J, 2002, TRAINING CREDENTIALL
[8]   Income and outcome metrics for the objective evaluation of ERCP and alternative methods [J].
Cotton, PB .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 56 (06) :S283-S290
[9]  
Cotton PB, 2002, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V97, P522
[10]  
Department of Health, 2002, LEARN BRIST DEP HLTH