The role of fairness and benefit distribution in community-based Payment for Environmental Services interventions: A case study from Menabe, Madagascar

被引:157
作者
Sommerville, Matthew [1 ]
Jones, Julia P. G. [2 ]
Rahajaharison, Michael [3 ]
Milner-Gulland, E. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Life Sci, Ascot SL5 7PY, Berks, England
[2] Bangor Univ, Sch Environm Nat Resources & Geog, Bangor LL57 2UW, Gwynedd, Wales
[3] Ny Havana, Morondava, Madagascar
关键词
Biodiversity conservation; Incentives; Fairness; Distribution; Community-based conservation; Payments for environmental services; Ecosystem services; INTEGRATED CONSERVATION; RESOURCE-MANAGEMENT; FOREST MANAGEMENT; AFRICA; WILDLIFE; PERFORMANCE; GOVERNANCE; PROTECTION; POVERTY; PROJECT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.005
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Community-based conservation interventions can only be successful in the long term if their aims and activities are accepted by local people. A key determinant of acceptability is the perceived fairness of the distribution of the costs and benefits of the intervention. We examined the opportunities and challenges posed by benefit distribution in community-based Payment for Environmental Services (PES) interventions through a case study from Menabe, Madagascar. The intervention appears to be an overall success, with individuals reporting high levels of perceived fairness of payment distribution and a high proportion of individuals expressing overall net benefit. Nevertheless, a lack of adequate benefits accruing to those individuals facing high agricultural opportunity costs and evidence of sub-groups in the community reaping excessive benefits was noted across communities, and instances of poor governance were observed as a barrier to success in some communities. We present solutions to address these key challenges in the design and implementation of community-based PES interventions. (c) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1262 / 1271
页数:10
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Adams WM, 2001, ORYX, V35, P193, DOI 10.1017/S0030605300031847
[2]   Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of poverty [J].
Adams, WM ;
Aveling, R ;
Brockington, D ;
Dickson, B ;
Elliott, J ;
Hutton, J ;
Roe, D ;
Vira, B ;
Wolmer, W .
SCIENCE, 2004, 306 (5699) :1146-1149
[3]   Poverty, property rights and collective action: understanding the distributive aspects of common property resource management [J].
Adhikari, H .
ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2005, 10 :7-31
[4]   Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation [J].
Agrawal, A ;
Gibson, CC .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 1999, 27 (04) :629-649
[5]   Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources [J].
Agrawal, A .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 29 (10) :1649-1672
[6]   MARKET FOR LEMONS - QUALITY UNCERTAINTY AND MARKET MECHANISM [J].
AKERLOF, GA .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1970, 84 (03) :488-500
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2003, WORLD DEV
[8]   Rights transfers in Madagascar biodiversity policies:: achievements and significance [J].
Antona, M ;
Biénabe, EM ;
Salles, JM ;
Péchard, G ;
Aubert, S ;
Ratsimbarison, R .
ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2004, 9 :825-847
[9]   Tourism revenue-sharing around national parks in Western Uganda: early efforts to identify and reward local communities [J].
Archabald, K ;
Naughton-Treves, L .
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2001, 28 (02) :135-149
[10]   The decline of a model community-based conservation project: Governance, capacity, and devolution in Mahenye, Zimbabwe [J].
Balint, Peter J. ;
Mashinya, Judith .
GEOFORUM, 2006, 37 (05) :805-815