Project-based learning and the role of learning boundaries

被引:215
作者
Scarbrough, H [1 ]
Swan, J
Laurent, S
Bresnen, M
Edelman, L
Newell, S
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Warwick Business Sch, IKON Res Ctr, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Leicester, Ctr Management, Leicester LE1 7RH, Leics, England
[3] Bentley Coll, Dept Management, Waltham, MA 02145 USA
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
projects; organizational learning; knowledge boundaries;
D O I
10.1177/0170840604048001
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper seeks to analyse the extent to which organizations can learn from projects by focusing on the relationship between projects and their organizational context. The paper highlights three dimensions of project-based learning: the practice-based nature of learning, project autonomy and knowledge integration. This analysis generates a number of propositions on the relationship between the learning generated within projects and its transfer to other parts of the organization. In particular, the paper highlights the 'learning boundaries' which emerge when learning within projects creates new divisions in practice. These propositions are explored through a comparative analysis of two case studies of construction projects. This analysis, suggests that the learning boundaries which develop around projects reflect the nested nature of learning, whereby different levels of learning may substitute for each other. Learning outcomes in the cases can thus be analysed in terms of the interplay between organizational learning and project-level learning. The paper concludes that learning boundaries are an important constraint on attempts to exploit the benefits of project-based learning for the wider organization.
引用
收藏
页码:1579 / 1600
页数:22
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Knowledge integration in virtual teams: The potential role of KMS [J].
Alavi, M ;
Tiwana, A .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 53 (12) :1029-1037
[2]   Project-based learning: Building communities of reflective practitioners [J].
Ayas, K ;
Zeniuk, N .
MANAGEMENT LEARNING, 2001, 32 (01) :61-76
[3]   Bridging distances:: Organizing boundary-spanning technology development projects [J].
Bengtsson, M ;
Söderholm, A .
REGIONAL STUDIES, 2002, 36 (03) :263-274
[4]   The structuration of organizational learning [J].
Berends, H ;
Boersma, K ;
Weggeman, M .
HUMAN RELATIONS, 2003, 56 (09) :1035-1056
[5]   Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective [J].
Brown, JS ;
Duguid, P .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2001, 12 (02) :198-213
[6]   A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development [J].
Carlile, PR .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2002, 13 (04) :442-455
[7]  
Chaston Ian., 1998, British Journal of Management, V9, P1, DOI [10.1111/1467-8551.00071, DOI 10.1111/1467-8551.00071]
[8]   ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY - A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION [J].
COHEN, WM ;
LEVINTHAL, DA .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1990, 35 (01) :128-152
[9]   Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing [J].
Cook, SDN ;
Brown, JS .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1999, 10 (04) :381-400
[10]   Paradox in project-based enterprise: The case of film making [J].
DeFillippi, RJ ;
Arthur, MB .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1998, 40 (02) :125-+