Pregnancy outcome after cervical cone excision:: a case-control study

被引:90
作者
Sjoborg, Katrine Donvold
Vistad, Ingvild
Myhr, Siv S.
Svenningsen, Rune
Herzog, Christine
Kloster-Jensen, Arild
Nygard, Gunhild
Hole, Solvi
Tanbo, Tom
机构
[1] Oestfold Hosp Trust, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, N-1603 Fredrikstad, Norway
[2] Vestfold Hosp Trust, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Tonsberg, Norway
[3] Telemark Hosp Trust, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Skien, Norway
[4] Baerum Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Oslo, Norway
[5] Buskerud Hosp Trust, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Drammen, Norway
[6] Ringerike Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Honefoss, Norway
[7] Rikshosp Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
conisation; cervical intraepithelial; neoplasia; pregnancy outcome;
D O I
10.1080/11038120701208158
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background. To investigate the effect of cervical laser conisation (CLC) or loop electrosurgical excision procedure ( LEEP) on the outcome of subsequent pregnancies. Methods. Multi-centre, retrospective, case-control study, which included a cohort of 742 women, who, after treatment with LEEP or CLC, gave birth or suffered second trimester miscarriage. Control women ( n = 742) were extracted from the respective hospital birth registries and matched by age and parity. Outcome measures were perinatal mortality, length of gestation, birth weight and preterm premature rupture of membranes (pPROM). Results. There was no significant difference in perinatal mortality among women treated with LCL or LEEP compared to controls, 6/742 versus 2/742: odds ratio ( OR) = 3.1 (95% CI: 0.6 - 15.2). Excluding second trimester miscarriages, ORs for giving birth before week 37, 32 and 28 after conisation compared to the controls were 3.4 ( 95% CI: 2.3 - 5.1), 4.6 ( 95% CI: 1.7 - 12.5), and 12.4 ( 95% CI: 1.6 - 96.1), respectively, after adjusting for smoking habits during pregnancy, marital status and educational level. Adjusted ORs of birth weight < 2,500, < 1,500 and < 1,000 g after conisation compared to controls were 3.9 ( 95% CI: 2.4 - 6.3), 4.4 ( 95% CI: 1.5 - 13.6), and 10.4 ( 95% CI: 1.3 - 82.2), respectively. The adjusted OR for pPROM was 10.5 ( 95% CI: 3.7 - 29.5). Conclusion. Treatment by CLC and LEEP increases the risk of preterm delivery, low birth weight and pPROM in subsequent pregnancies.
引用
收藏
页码:423 / 428
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure for the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [J].
Acharya G. ;
Kjeldberg I. ;
Hansen S.M. ;
Sørheim N. ;
Jacobsen B.K. ;
Maltau J.M. .
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2005, 272 (2) :109-112
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Categorical data analysis
[3]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY, DOI DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD001318
[4]   Laser 'miniconisation' and the outcome of subsequent pregnancy [J].
Bekassy, Z ;
Iosif, CS .
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 1996, 258 (02) :75-79
[5]   PREGNANCY OUTCOME AFTER LARGE LOOP EXCISION OF THE CERVICAL TRANSFORMATION ZONE [J].
BLOMFIELD, PI ;
BUXTON, J ;
DUNN, J ;
LUESLEY, DM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1993, 169 (03) :620-625
[6]   Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: A systematic review [J].
Crane, JMG .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 102 (05) :1058-1062
[7]   Lung and brain damage in preterm newborns, and their association with gestational age, prematurity subgroup, infection/inflammation and long term outcome [J].
Dammann, O ;
Leviton, A ;
Gappa, M ;
Dammann, CEL .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2005, 112 :4-9
[8]   Effect of cervical carcinoma in situ and its management on pregnancy outcome [J].
El-Bastawissi, AY ;
Becker, TM ;
Daling, JR .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 93 (02) :207-212
[9]   THE EFFECT OF CERVICAL LOOP ELECTROSURGICAL EXCISION ON SUBSEQUENT PREGNANCY OUTCOME - NORTH-AMERICAN EXPERIENCE [J].
FERENCZY, A ;
CHOUKROUN, D ;
FALCONE, T ;
FRANCO, E .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 172 (04) :1246-1250
[10]   THE OUTCOME OF PREGNANCY AFTER CO2-LASER CONIZATION OF THE CERVIX [J].
HAGEN, B ;
SKJELDESTAD, FE .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1993, 100 (08) :717-720