Use of preference testing to identify tolerance limits for fruit visual attributes in apple breeding

被引:22
作者
Hampson, CR [1 ]
Quamme, HA [1 ]
机构
[1] Agr Canada, Pacific Agri Food Res Ctr, Summerland, BC V0H 1Z0, Canada
关键词
consumer; fruit shape; fruit size; lenticels; Malus xdomestica; russet; sensory evaluation;
D O I
10.21273/HORTSCI.35.5.921
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
Sensory evaluation methods were used to establish tentative guidelines for screening apple (Malus x domestica Borkh.) breeding selections for four visual attributes. A panel of 42 regional consumers rated sample selections for fruit size on the 7-point "Just Right" (JR) scale, for fruit shape on a 7-point hedonic (liking) scale, and for the appearance of lenticels and stem bowl russet (SBR) on a 7-point affective (acceptability) scale. The panel most preferred a fruit about 7.5 cm in diameter. No evidence was found for range bias or for differences between yellow and red apples in size preference. Women and panelists over 55 years of age tended to prefer a slightly smaller apple. Panelists liked all the most common apple shapes. Lenticels generally became unacceptable when they exceeded 1.0 mm in diameter, but lenticel density was not related to acceptability. For red or yellow apples, SBR was acceptable on average, provided its maximum extent did not exceed about 55% of the fruit diameter. The panel's tolerance to SBR resembled that of a larger regional population, and their fruit size preferences resembled those reported elsewhere for European consumers. Similar methods could be used by other breeders to assess the preferences of their target consumer population.
引用
收藏
页码:921 / 924
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1958, Planning of Experiments
[2]  
*BRIT COL MIN AGR, 1996, TREE FRUIT PROD GUID
[3]  
*CAN HORT COUNC, 1979, SURV CAN CONS APPL O
[4]   Relationships between perceived sensory properties and major preference directions of 12 varieties of apples from the southern hemisphere [J].
DaillantSpinnler, B ;
MacFie, HJH ;
Beyts, PK ;
Hedderley, D .
FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 1996, 7 (02) :113-126
[5]  
GOEDEGEBURE J, 1990, SAKE CONSUMER DUTCH
[6]   Fruit characteristics and sensory attributes of an ideal sweet cherry [J].
Kappel, F ;
FisherFleming, B ;
Hogue, E .
HORTSCIENCE, 1996, 31 (03) :443-446
[7]   IDEAL PEAR SENSORY ATTRIBUTES AND FRUIT CHARACTERISTICS [J].
KAPPEL, F ;
FISHERFLEMING, R ;
HOGUE, EJ .
HORTSCIENCE, 1995, 30 (05) :988-993
[8]  
Land DG, 1988, Sensory analysis of foods, P155
[9]  
MCBRIDE RL, 1982, J FOOD TECHNOL, V17, P405, DOI 10.1191/026635599670332923
[10]  
Meilgaard M.C., 1999, Sensory evaluation techniques