Synthesis and repellent efficacy of a new chiral piperidine analog:: Comparison with Deet and Bayrepel activity in human-volunteer laboratory assays against Aedes aegypti and Anopheles stephensi

被引:42
作者
Klun, JA [1 ]
Khrimian, A
Margaryan, K
Kramer, M
Debboun, M
机构
[1] USDA ARS, PSI, Chem Affecting Insect Behav Lab, Beltsville, MD 20705 USA
[2] USDA ARS, BA, Biomat Consulting Serv, Beltsville, MD 20705 USA
[3] Walter Reed Army Inst Res, Div Communicable Dis & Immunol, Dept Entomol, Silver Spring, MD 20910 USA
关键词
(1S; 2; S)-2-methylpiperidinyl-3-cyclohexen-1-carboxamide; 2-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperidinecarboxylic; acid I-methylpropyl ester; N; N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide; Aedes aegypti; Anopheles stephensi;
D O I
10.1603/0022-2585-40.3.293
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
Optically active (1S, 2'S)-2-methylpiperidinyl-3-cyclohexen-1-carboxamide (SS220) is a new synthetic arthropod repellent. A three-step synthesis based on a chiral Diels-Alder reaction and diastereomeric resolution of 2-methylpiperidine was developed to prepare the compound. Quantitative laboratory assays using human volunteers compared the effectiveness of SS220 with the commonly used repellents Deet and Bayrepel against Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus) and Anopheles stephensi Liston mosquitoes. In two experiments using Aedes aegypti, one using a single identical dose and one with varying doses used to develop a dose-response curve, SS220 was as effective as Deet and both compounds were more effective than Bayrepel. The three compounds were equally effective against An. stephensi. Based on the ease of its synthetic preparation and its repellent efficacy, we surmise that SS220 is a candidate to serve as a new and effective alternate repellent for protection against arthropod disease vectors.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 299
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   An improved resolution of 2-methyl piperidine and its use in the synthesis of homochiral trans-2,6-dialkyl piperidines [J].
Adamo, MFA ;
Aggarwal, VK ;
Sage, MA .
SYNTHETIC COMMUNICATIONS, 1999, 29 (10) :1747-1756
[2]  
BARTLETT PD, 1973, ORG SYNTH, V5, P196
[3]  
BINGER P, 1989, LIEBIGS ANN CHEM, P739
[4]  
Centers for Disease Control (CDC), 1989, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, V38, P678
[5]   LABORATORY EVALUATION OF REPELLENTS AGAINST 4 ANOPHELINE MOSQUITOS (DIPTERA, CULICIDAE) AND 2 PHLEBOTOMINE SAND FLIES (DIPTERA, PSYCHODIDAE) [J].
COLEMAN, RE ;
ROBERT, LL ;
ROBERTS, LW ;
GLASS, JA ;
SEELEY, DC ;
LAUGHINGHOUSE, A ;
PERKINS, PV ;
WIRTZ, RA .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 1993, 30 (03) :499-502
[6]  
CRAIG JC, 1971, J ORG CHEM, V36, P3648
[7]   Field evaluation of deet and a piperidine repellent against Aedes communis (Diptera: Culicidae) and Simulium venustum (Diptera: Simuliidae) in the Adirondack mountains of new York [J].
Debboun, M ;
Strickman, D ;
Solberg, VB ;
Wilkerson, RC ;
McPherson, KR ;
Golenda, C ;
Keep, L ;
Wirtz, RA ;
Burge, R ;
Klein, TA .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 2000, 37 (06) :919-923
[8]   Laboratory and field evaluation of the repellents deet, CIC-4, and AI3-37220 against Anopheles farauti (Diptera: Culicidae) in Australia [J].
Frances, SP ;
Cooper, RD ;
Sweeney, AW .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 1998, 35 (05) :690-693
[9]   Laboratory and field evaluation of deet, CIC-4, and AI3-37220 against Anopheles dirus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Thailand [J].
Frances, SP ;
Klein, TA ;
Hildebrandt, DW ;
Burge, R ;
Noigamol, C ;
Eikarat, N ;
Sripongsai, B ;
Wirtz, RA .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 1996, 33 (04) :511-515
[10]  
Gerberg E.J., 1994, AM MOSQ CONTROL ASS, V5