Medication errors in hospitals:: computerized unit dose drug dispensing system versus ward stock distribution system

被引:75
作者
Fontan, JE
Maneglier, V
Nguyen, VX
Loirat, C
Brion, F
机构
[1] Hop Robert Debre, APHP, Lab Toxicopharmacol, F-75019 Paris, France
[2] Hop Robert Debre, APHP, Serv Nephrol Pediat, F-75019 Paris, France
来源
PHARMACY WORLD & SCIENCE | 2003年 / 25卷 / 03期
关键词
administration error; computer; France; hospital pharmacy; medication error; pediatrics; nurse; prescription error; INTENSIVE-CARE;
D O I
10.1023/A:1024053514359
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the rates and types of drug prescription and administration errors in one pediatric nephrology ward, comparing two dispensing schemes : the first one defined as handwritten prescription plus ward stock distribution system (WSDS), and the second one as computerized prescription plus unit dose drug dispensing system (UDDDS). Method: Data were collected over an 8-week period, from 1 February to 31 March 1999. Two fifth-year pharmacy students photocopied prescription and administration documents on the ward each day, under the supervision of a senior pharmacist. The medical record analysis was used to compare the prescription with the administration report. Prescribing and administration medication errors were classified according to the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. Results: Prescribing errors: overall, for both dispensing schemes, a total of 511 prescriptions, resulting in 4532 prescribed drugs ( an average of 9 drugs per prescription) were prescribed. The total prescription error rate was 20.7% ( 937 of 4532), resulting in 1.9 errors per patient per day. The computerized prescription error rate was 10.6% ( 419 of 3943), the handwritten prescription error rate was 87.9% ( 518 of 589). This difference was very significant ( P < 0.0001). Administration errors: the total opportunity of administration errors was 4589 ( sum of administered and omitted drugs). The total administration error rate was 23.5% ( 1077 of 4589) including wrong administration time, and 11.7% ( 538 of 4589) excluding administration time. The administration error rate, including administration associated with time errors, was only 22.5% ( 888 of 3943) for computerized prescription + UDDDS, compared with 29.3% ( 189 of 646) for handwritten prescriptions plus WSDS ( P < 0.001). Excluding administration associated with time errors, the administration error rates were 9.7% and 24.3%, respectively (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: The drug prescription and administration error rates were significantly decreased using computerized prescription plus UDDDS as compared with handwritten prescription plus WSDS in a pediatric unit (even with potential biases taken into account).
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 117
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   FUNDAMENTALS OF MEDICATION ERROR RESEARCH [J].
ALLAN, EL ;
BARKER, KN .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 1990, 47 (03) :555-571
[2]  
American Society of Hospital Pharmacists, 1993, AM J HOSP PHARM, V50, P305
[3]  
*ASHP, 1998, AM J HEALTH-SYST PH, V55, P165
[4]  
*ASHP REP, 1994, AM J HOSP PHARM, V51, P1690
[5]  
*ASHP REP, 1992, AM J HOSP PHARM, V49, P640
[6]  
Barker K., 1966, HOSP FORMUL, V1, P29
[7]   RESEARCH ON DRUG-USE-SYSTEM ERRORS [J].
BARKER, KN ;
ALLAN, EL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 1995, 52 (04) :400-403
[8]  
Barker KN., 1962, Am J Hosp Pharm, V19, P361
[9]   Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors [J].
Bates, DW ;
Leape, LL ;
Cullen, DJ ;
Laird, N ;
Petersen, LA ;
Teich, JM ;
Burdick, E ;
Hickey, M ;
Kleefield, S ;
Shea, B ;
Vander Vliet, M ;
Seger, DL .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (15) :1311-1316
[10]   RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MEDICATION ERRORS AND ADVERSE DRUG EVENTS [J].
BATES, DW ;
BOYLE, DL ;
VLIET, MVV ;
SCHNEIDER, J ;
LEAPE, L .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1995, 10 (04) :199-205