A comparative study of artificial neural networks and neuro-fuzzy in continuous modeling of the daily and hourly behaviour of runoff

被引:132
作者
Aqil, Muhammad
Kita, Ichiro [1 ]
Yano, Akira
Nishiyama, Soichi
机构
[1] Shimane Univ, Fac Life & Environm Sci, Matsue, Shimane 6908504, Japan
[2] Tottori Univ, United Grad Sch Agr Sci, Tottori 6808573, Japan
[3] Yamaguchi Univ, Fac Agr, Yamaguchi 7538515, Japan
关键词
neural networks; neuro-fuzzy; rainfall-runoff; modeling;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.01.013
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Modeling of rainfall-runoff dynamics is one of the most studied topics in hydrology due to its essential application to water resources management. Recently, artificial intelligence has gained much popularity for calibrating the nonlinear relationships inherent in the rainfall-runoff process. In this study, the advantages of artificial neural networks and neuro-fuzzy system in continuous modeling of the daily and hourly behaviour of runoff were examined. Three different adaptive techniques were constructed and examined namely, Levenberg-Marquardt feed forward neural network Bayesian regularization feed forward neural network, and neuro-fuzzy. In addition, the effects of data transformation on model performance were also investigated. This was done by examining the performance of the three network architectures and training algorithms using both raw and transformed data. Through inspection of the results it was found that although the model built on transformed data outperforms the model built on raw data, no significant differences were found between the forecast accuracies of the three examined models. A detailed comparison of the overall performance indicated that the neuro-fuzzy model performed better than both the Levenberg-Marquardt-FFNN and the Bayesian regularization-FFNN. In order to enable users to process the data easily, a graphic user interface (GUI) was developed. This program allows users to process the rainfall-runoff data, to train/test the model using various input options and to visualize results. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 34
页数:13
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Bazartseren B, 2003, NEUROCOMPUTING, V55, P439, DOI [10.1016/S0925-2312(03)00388-6, 10.1016/S0925-2312(03)00388-5]
[2]  
Brown M, 1994, NEUROFUZZY ADAPTIVE
[3]   River flood forecasting with a neural network model [J].
Campolo, M ;
Andreussi, P ;
Soldati, A .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1999, 35 (04) :1191-1197
[4]   Forecasting river flow rate during low-pow periods using neural networks [J].
Campolo, M ;
Soldati, A ;
Andreussi, P .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1999, 35 (11) :3547-3552
[5]   Real-time recurrent learning neural network for stream-flow forecasting [J].
Chang, FJ ;
Chang, LC ;
Huang, HL .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2002, 16 (13) :2577-2588
[6]   A counterpropagation fuzzy-neural network modeling approach to real time streamflow prediction [J].
Chang, FJ ;
Chen, YC .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2001, 245 (1-4) :153-164
[7]  
Chiu SL., 1994, J INTELL FUZZY SYST, V2, P267, DOI [DOI 10.3233/IFS-1994-2306, 10.3233/IFS-1994-2306]
[8]  
COJBASIC Z, 2003, MECH ENG SERIES, V1, P1393
[9]   Artificial neural network modeling of water table depth fluctuations [J].
Coulibaly, P ;
Anctil, F ;
Aravena, R ;
Bobée, B .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2001, 37 (04) :885-896
[10]   Groundwater level forecasting using artificial neural networks [J].
Daliakopoulos, IN ;
Coulibaly, P ;
Tsanis, IK .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2005, 309 (1-4) :229-240