Comparative study on several blind deconvolution algorithms applied to underwater image restoration

被引:7
作者
Fan, Fan [1 ]
Yang, Kecheng [1 ]
Xia, Min [1 ]
Li, Wei [1 ]
Fu, Bo [1 ]
Zhang, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Wuhan Natl Lab Optoelect, Sch Optoelect Sci & Engn, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
关键词
underwater imaging; image restoration; blind deconvolution; Richardson-Lucy algorithm; least-squares algorithm; multiplicative iterative algorithm; RICHARDSON-LUCY ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1007/s10043-010-0022-7
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Although the use of blind deconvolution of image restoration is a widely known concept, only few reports have discussed in detail its application to solving problem of restoration of underwater range-gated laser images. A comparative study of underwater image restoration using the Richardson-Lucy algorithm, the least-squares algorithm, and the multiplicative iterative algorithm for blind deconvolution is presented. All the deconvolution approaches use denoised underwater images and Wells' small angle approximation theory of derived point spread function as the initial object and degradation guess, respectively. Owing the underwater no-reference imaging environment, image quality judgment based on the blur metric method is incorporated in our comparison to determine the appropriate deconvolution iteration number for each algorithm, which objectively evaluates the image restoration results. The performance of the three algorithms applied to underwater image restoration is discussed and reported.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 129
页数:7
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   BLIND DECONVOLUTION BY MEANS OF THE RICHARDSON-LUCY ALGORITHM [J].
FISH, DA ;
BRINICOMBE, AM ;
PIKE, ER ;
WALKER, JG .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1995, 12 (01) :58-65
[2]   Comparison and validation of point spread models for imaging in natural waters [J].
Hou, Weilin ;
Gray, Deric J. ;
Weidemann, Alan D. ;
Arnone, Robert A. .
OPTICS EXPRESS, 2008, 16 (13) :9958-9965
[3]   Why does the Secchi disk disappear? An imaging perspective [J].
Hou, Weilin ;
Lee, Zhongping ;
Weidemann, Alan D. .
OPTICS EXPRESS, 2007, 15 (06) :2791-2802
[4]   Comparison between ISRA and RLA algorithms.: Use of a Wiener Filter based stopping criterion [J].
Lantéri, H ;
Soummer, R ;
Aime, C .
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS SUPPLEMENT SERIES, 1999, 140 (02) :235-246
[5]   Blind deconvolution using least squares minimisation [J].
Law, NF ;
Lane, RG .
OPTICS COMMUNICATIONS, 1996, 128 (4-6) :341-352
[6]   HIGH-ACCURACY FAST HANKEL TRANSFORM FOR OPTICAL BEAM PROPAGATION [J].
MAGNI, V ;
CERULLO, G ;
DESILVESTRI, S .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1992, 9 (11) :2031-2033
[7]   Perceptual blur and ringing metrics: application to JPEG2000 [J].
Marziliano, P ;
Dufaux, F ;
Winkler, S ;
Ebrahimi, T .
SIGNAL PROCESSING-IMAGE COMMUNICATION, 2004, 19 (02) :163-172
[8]   Least-squares methods with Poissonian noise: Analysis and comparison with the Richardson-Lucy algorithm [J].
Vio, R ;
Bardsley, J ;
Wamsteker, W .
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2005, 436 (02) :741-755
[9]  
WELLS WH, 1973, OPTICS SEA, P1
[10]   Blind deconvolution: multiplicative iterative algorithm [J].
Zhang, Jianlin ;
Zhang, Qiheng ;
He, Guangming .
OPTICS LETTERS, 2008, 33 (01) :25-27