Use of new EST markers to elucidate the genetic differences in grain protein content between European and North American two-rowed malting barleys

被引:26
作者
Moralejo, M
Swanston, JS
Muñoz, P
Prada, D
Elía, M
Russell, JR
Ramsay, L
Cistué, L
Codesal, P
Casas, AM
Romagosa, I
Powell, W
Molina-Cano, JL
机构
[1] Ctr UdL IRTA, Lleida 25198, Spain
[2] Scottish Crop Res Inst, Dundee DD2 5DA, Scotland
[3] CSIC, Estac Expt Aula Dei, E-50080 Zaragoza, Spain
[4] ITA, Valladolid 47080, Spain
[5] Univ Adelaide, Sch Agr & Wine, Glen Osmond, SA, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s00122-004-1805-7
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
A population comprising 102 doubled haploid lines were produced from a cross between Beka, a barley cultivar widely grown in Spain, and Logan, a north American cultivar with inherently low protein content, a character considered to derive from the cultivar Karl. The intentions were to determine whether low-nitrogen malting barleys could be developed in Spain, and if genetic factors that influenced protein content were similarly expressed in widely diverse environments, i.e. northeastern Spain and eastern Scotland. An extensive map comprising 187 molecular markers was developed. Expressed sequence-tagged-derived markers were used in addition to anonymous simple sequence repeats to determine the potential for identifying candidate genes for quantitative trait loci (QTLs), and 22 such markers were mapped for the first time. There was transgressive segregation for both yield and protein content, and the gene for low protein from Logan was not expressed in the Scottish environment. In 2002, high yield was associated with earlier heading date in Spain, while late heading at the Scottish site was associated with greater lodging and lower thousand-kernel weight. These appeared to be possible pleiotropic effects of a factor detected on chromosome 2H. Using information from a consensus map, it was shown that this locus on 2H was in the region of the photoperiod response gene Eam6. A QTL explaining 18% of the variation in grain protein content was detected on chromosome 5H in a region in which a gene for nitrate reductase was previously observed. No effect on grain protein was associated with chromosome 6H, which has been suggested as the location of the low protein gene from Karl. However, it is likely that Karl contained more than one genetic factor reducing protein, and we postulate that the gene on 6H may have been lost during the breeding of Logan.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 125
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   FACTORS CONTROLLING FERMENTABLE EXTRACT IN DISTILLERS MALT [J].
BATHGATE, GN ;
MARTINEZFRIAS, J ;
STARK, JR .
JOURNAL OF THE INSTITUTE OF BREWING, 1978, 84 (01) :22-29
[2]   BARLEY MICROSATELLITES - ALLELE VARIATION AND MAPPING [J].
BECKER, J ;
HEUN, M .
PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1995, 27 (04) :835-845
[3]  
BELOW FE, 1995, HDB PLANT CROP PHYSL, P280
[4]  
Doyle JJ., 1987, FOCUS, V19, P11, DOI DOI 10.2307/2419362
[5]   The development of beta-glucanase and degradation of beta-glucan in barley grown in Scotland and Spain [J].
Ellis, RP ;
Swanston, JS ;
Rubio, A ;
PerezVendrell, AM ;
Romagosa, I ;
MolinaCano, JL .
JOURNAL OF CEREAL SCIENCE, 1997, 26 (01) :75-82
[6]   Identification of QTLs associated with variations in grain protein concentration in two-row barley [J].
Emebiri, LC ;
Moody, DB ;
Panozzo, JF ;
Chalmers, KJ ;
Kretschmer, JM ;
Ablett, GA .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2003, 54 (11-12) :1211-1221
[7]   Assessment of genotypic variation among cultivated durum wheat based on EST-SSRS and genomic SSRS [J].
Eujayl, I ;
Sorrells, M ;
Baum, M ;
Wolters, P ;
Powell, W .
EUPHYTICA, 2001, 119 (1-2) :39-43
[8]  
FRANCKOWIAK J, 2002, BARLEY GENET NEWSLET, V32
[9]   A strategy to breed low-protein barley with acceptable kernel color and diastatic power [J].
Goblirsch, CA ;
Horsley, RD ;
Schwarz, PB .
CROP SCIENCE, 1996, 36 (01) :41-44
[10]   Data mining for simple sequence repeats in expressed sequence tags from barley, maize, rice, sorghum and wheat [J].
Kantety, RV ;
La Rota, M ;
Matthews, DE ;
Sorrells, ME .
PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2002, 48 (05) :501-510