Forecasting solar wind structures and shock arrival times using an ensemble of models

被引:137
作者
Fry, CD
Dryer, M
Smith, Z
Sun, W
Deehr, CS
Akasofu, SI
机构
[1] Explorat Phys Int Inc, Huntsville, AL 35806 USA
[2] NOAA, Space Environm Ctr, Boulder, CO 80305 USA
[3] Univ Alaska Fairbanks, Inst Geophys, Fairbanks, AK 99775 USA
[4] Univ Alaska Fairbanks, Int Arctic Res Ctr, Fairbanks, AK 99775 USA
关键词
space weather; interplanetary shocks; solar flares; forecasting real-time; geomagnetic storms; storm sudden comencements;
D O I
10.1029/2002JA009474
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
[1] Forecasting the time of arrival at Earth of interplanetary shocks following solar metric type II activity is an important first step in the establishment of an operational space weather prediction system. The quality of the forecasts is of utmost importance. The performances of the shock time of arrival (STOA) and interplanetary shock propagation models (ISPM) were previously evaluated by Smith et al. [2000] for 36 solar events. Here we use 173 solar events between February 1997 and October 2000 to set thresholds for the Hakamada-Akasofu-Fry version 2 (HAFv.2) model and then present the results of a comparison of the performance of this model to the STOA and ISPM solar wind models. Each model predicts shock arrival time (SAT) at the Earth using real-time metric type II radio frequency drifts and coincident X-ray and optical data for input and L1 satellite observations for verification. Our evaluation of input parameters to the models showed that the accuracy of the solar metric type II radio burst observations as a measure of the initial shock velocity was compromised for those events at greater than 20 solar longitude from central meridian. The HAF model also calculates the interplanetary shock propagation imbedded in a realistic solar wind structure through which the shocks travel and interact. Standard meteorological forecast metrics are used. A variety of statistical comparisons among the three models show them to be practically equivalent in forecasting SAT. Although the HAF kinematic model performance compares favorably with ISPM and STOA, it appears to be no better at predicting SAT than ISPM or STOA. HAFv.2 takes the inhomogeneous, ambient solar wind structure into account and thereby provides a means of sorting event-driven shock arrivals from corotating interaction region (CIR) passage.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   HELIOSPHERIC CURRENT SHEET AND ITS SOLAR-CYCLE VARIATIONS [J].
AKASOFU, SI ;
FRY, CD .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 1986, 91 (A12) :3679-3688
[2]   QUANTITATIVE FORECASTING OF THE 27-DAY RECURRENT MAGNETIC ACTIVITY [J].
AKASOFU, SI ;
OLMSTED, C ;
SAITO, T ;
OKI, T .
PLANETARY AND SPACE SCIENCE, 1988, 36 (11) :1133-1147
[3]  
Akasofu SI, 2001, GEOPH MONOG SERIES, V125, P329
[4]   Improvement in the prediction of solar wind conditions using near-real time solar magnetic field updates [J].
Arge, CN ;
Pizzo, VJ .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2000, 105 (A5) :10465-10479
[5]   Interplanetary fast shocks and associated drivers observed through the 23rd solar minimum by Wind over its first 2.5 years [J].
Berdichevsky, DB ;
Szabo, A ;
Lepping, RP ;
Viñas, AF ;
Mariani, F .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2000, 105 (A12) :27289-27314
[6]   Multidimensional, magnetohydrodynamic simulation of solar-generated disturbances: Space weather forecasting of geomagnetic storms [J].
Dryer, M .
AIAA JOURNAL, 1998, 36 (03) :365-370
[7]   INTERPLANETARY STUDIES - PROPAGATION OF DISTURBANCES BETWEEN THE SUN AND THE MAGNETOSPHERE [J].
DRYER, M .
SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS, 1994, 67 (3-4) :363-419
[8]  
Dryer M, 2002, ESA SP PUBL, V477, P9
[9]  
Dryer M., 1984, Advances in Space Research, V4, P291, DOI 10.1016/0273-1177(84)90200-X
[10]  
DRYER M, 1974, SPACE SCI REV, V15, P403, DOI 10.1007/BF00178215