Quantifying the effects of habitat structure on prey detectability and accessibility to farmland birds

被引:109
作者
Butler, SJ
Gillings, S
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Zool, Edward Grey Inst Field Ornithol, Oxford OX1 3PS, England
[2] British Trust Ornithol, Thetford IP24 2PU, Norfolk, England
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1474-919X.2004.00352.x
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
For species that rely on visual cues to detect prey items, increasing the structural complexity of a patch can greatly influence forager behaviour through consequent reductions in prey detectability and accessibility. These effects are likely to manifest themselves in terms of foraging site selection and there is plentiful evidence for preferential site selection for a suite of taxa. However, the underlying effects of habitat structure on foraging behaviour, which are likely to drive these observed site selections, are much less well understood. We present the results of two studies designed to quantify the effects of vegetation structure on prey detectability and accessibility to avian invertebrate feeders and granivores on farmland. There was a significant negative relationship between potential prey detectability and both distance and vegetation height in cereal crops and stubbles for Northern Lapwings Vanellus vanellus. The interscan distance travelled by Lapwings differed significantly between habitats, with longer distances travelled in cereal crops and harrowed compared with ploughed soil and grasses. The peck rate, head-up rate and mean search period of foraging Chaffinches Fringilla coelebs were not affected by increasing vegetation structure but forager mobility was significantly reduced. We hope that by quantifying the effects of vegetation structure on prey detectability and accessibility we can highlight the importance of considering these factors, as well as prey abundance, when developing management strategies for farmland birds.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 130
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF BEHAVIOR - SAMPLING METHODS [J].
ALTMANN, J .
BEHAVIOUR, 1974, 49 (3-4) :227-267
[2]   Saltatory search: A theoretical analysis [J].
Anderson, JP ;
Stephens, DW ;
Dunbar, SR .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 1997, 8 (03) :307-317
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1981, Statistical Tables
[4]  
[Anonymous], THESIS U E ANGLIA
[5]   Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? [J].
Benton, TG ;
Vickery, JA ;
Wilson, JD .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2003, 18 (04) :182-188
[6]  
Brodmann PA, 1997, ETHOLOGY, V103, P222
[7]   PATCH USE AS AN INDICATOR OF HABITAT PREFERENCE, PREDATION RISK, AND COMPETITION [J].
BROWN, JS .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 1988, 22 (01) :37-47
[8]   Competition between birds and mammals: A comparison of giving-up densities between crested larks and gerbils [J].
Brown, JS ;
Kotler, BP ;
Mitchell, WA .
EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY, 1997, 11 (06) :757-771
[9]   FORAGING RATES OF STARLINGS IN 2 HABITATS [J].
BROWNSMITH, CB .
CONDOR, 1977, 79 (03) :386-387
[10]   Good foragers can also be good at detecting predators [J].
Cresswell, W ;
Quinn, JL ;
Whittingham, MJ ;
Butler, S .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2003, 270 (1519) :1069-1076