Test of a simple model for estimating evaporation from bare soils in different environments

被引:53
作者
Aydin, M [1 ]
Yang, SL
Kurt, N
Yano, T
机构
[1] Mustafa Kemal Univ, Dept Soil Sci, Fac Agr, TR-31040 Antakya, Turkey
[2] Tottori Univ, Fac Agr, Tottori 6808553, Japan
[3] Tottori Univ, Arid Land Res Ctr, Tottori 6800001, Japan
关键词
soil evaporation; soil-water potential; modeling;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.07.013
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
A simplified model originally proposed by Aydin [Aydin, M., 1998a. A new model for predicting evaporation from bare field soil. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium and second Chinese National Conference on Rainwater Utilization, Xuzhou-Jiangsu, China, pp. 283-287] for estimating actual evaporation from bare soils was tested under different environmental conditions. Field experiments were carried out on clay soils in a semi-arid region of Turkey. A sandy soil column-experiment in a drying chamber and a study with the same sand media in a greenhouse were conducted at Arid Land Research Center, Tottori University, Japan, in order to test the performance of the model. The model is based on the relations among potential and actual soil evaporation and soil-water potential at the top surface layer of the soil, with some simplifying assumptions. Input parameters of the model are simple and relatively obtainable viz. climatic parameters for the calculations of potential soil evaporation and matric potential measured near the soil surface. Despite some differences between calculated and measured soil evaporation, the agreement was reasonable at all sites. This agreement seems to support the model assumptions, and the model is potentially valuable, but the objective measurement of soil-water potential near the surface of the profile is difficult, especially for a drier upper layer. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 105
页数:15
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
ALLEN RG, 1994, ICID B, V43, P92
[2]   Model for evaporation, moisture and temperature of bare soil: calibration and sensitivity analysis [J].
Alvenas, G ;
Jansson, PE .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 1997, 88 (1-4) :47-56
[3]  
ARMSTRONG AC, 1993, NATO ADV RES WORKSH
[4]   TEST OF A COMBINED SOIL-MOISTURE SOIL HEAT SIMULATION-MODEL ON A BARE FIELD SOIL IN SOUTHERN TURKEY [J].
AYDIN, M ;
HUWE, B .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PFLANZENERNAHRUNG UND BODENKUNDE, 1993, 156 (05) :441-446
[5]  
AYDIN M, 1994, IRRIGATION SCI, V15, P17, DOI 10.1007/BF00187791
[6]  
AYDIN M, 1998, P MSY INT S AR REG S, P432
[7]  
Aydin M, 1998, P INT S 2 CHIN NAT C, P283
[8]   INFLUENCE OF HYSTERESIS ON MOISTURE FLOW IN AN UNDISTURBED SOIL MONOLITH [J].
BEESE, F ;
VANDERPLOEG, RR .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1976, 40 (04) :480-484
[9]   TEST OF A SOIL-WATER MODEL UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS [J].
BEESE, F ;
VANDERPLOEG, RR ;
RICHTER, W .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1977, 41 (05) :979-984
[10]   SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF THE PENMAN-MONTEITH ACTUAL EVAPOTRANSPIRATION ESTIMATES [J].
BEVEN, K .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1979, 44 (3-4) :169-190