The impact of poor bowel preparation on colonoscopy: a prospective single centre study of 10 571 colonoscopies

被引:96
作者
Hendry, P. O. [1 ]
Jenkins, J. T. [1 ]
Diament, R. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Crosshouse Hosp, Dept Surg, Kilmarnock, Scotland
关键词
colonoscopy; mechanical bowel preparation; investigation;
D O I
10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01220.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective Colonoscopy is regarded as the most sensitive method of evaluating the colon. Inadequate preparation reduces sensitivity and has adverse implications for individual patients and the Heath Service. Method Data concerning the adequacy of bowel preparation and colonoscopy completion rates were prospectively collected on all colonoscopies performed in a single centre between January 1996 and January 2005. In addition, the strategy of further investigation in the event of incomplete examination was assessed. Results A total of 10 571 colonoscopies were assessed and poor bowel preparation was identified in 1788 of these cases (16.9%). The completion rate was 67.5% in those with satisfactory preparation. In patients with poor preparation, 36% of colonoscopies were complete. Incomplete examination was more likely with poor preparation [OR = 3.76 (95% CI, 3.38-4.18), P = 0.0005]. Poor preparation was more likely for inpatients [OR = 3.54 (95% CI 3.14-3.96), P = 0.0005]. Even with satisfactory preparation, inpatient completion rates were significantly less [OR = 1.78 (95% CI, 3.14-3.96), P = 0.0005). A further 542 diagnostic procedures were undertaken in the poor preparation group, an additional 101 pound 950 (e149 459) in expenditure. Conclusion This study supports the view that inpatients fare badly. This is partly explained by higher rates of poor preparation; however, completion rates were reduced even with adequate preparation. Failed investigation and prolonged hospital stay increase cost. Colonoscopy completion rates need to be improved with particular attention to inpatients.
引用
收藏
页码:745 / 748
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]
Quality improvement programme to achieve acceptable colonoscopy completion rates: prospective before and after study [J].
Ball, JE ;
Osbourne, J ;
Jowett, S ;
Pellen, M ;
Welfare, MR .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 329 (7467) :665-667
[2]
Barrison I, 2001, PROVISION ENDOSCOPY
[3]
A prospective study of factors that determine cecal intubation time at colonoscopy [J].
Bernstein, C ;
Thorn, M ;
Monsees, K ;
Spell, R ;
O'Connor, JB .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 61 (01) :72-75
[4]
A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow? [J].
Bowles, CJA ;
Leicester, R ;
Romaya, C ;
Swarbrick, E ;
Williams, CB ;
Epstein, O .
GUT, 2004, 53 (02) :277-283
[5]
Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study [J].
Froehlich, F ;
Wietlisbach, V ;
Gonvers, JJ ;
Burnand, B ;
Vader, JP .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 61 (03) :378-384
[6]
Gorard D A, 2004, Colorectal Dis, V6, P243, DOI 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00628.x
[7]
SHOULD COLONOSCOPY BE THE 1ST INVESTIGATION FOR COLONIC DISEASE [J].
LINDSAY, DC ;
FREEMAN, JG ;
COBDEN, I ;
RECORD, CO .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1988, 296 (6616) :167-169
[8]
Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy [J].
Ness, RM ;
Manam, R ;
Hoen, H ;
Chalasani, N .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2001, 96 (06) :1797-1802
[9]
*ROYAL COLL PHYS, 2001, GUID TRAIN APR ASS T
[10]
A comparison of colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema for surveillance after polypectomy. [J].
Winawer, SJ ;
Stewart, ET ;
Zauber, AG ;
Bond, JH ;
Ansel, H ;
Waye, JD ;
Hall, D ;
Hamlin, JA ;
Schapiro, M ;
O'Brien, MJ ;
Sternberg, SS ;
Gottlieb, LS .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 342 (24) :1766-1772