Deriving priorities from fuzzy pairwise comparison judgements

被引:420
作者
Mikhailov, L [1 ]
机构
[1] UMIST, Dept Computat, Manchester M60 1QD, Lancs, England
关键词
fuzzy mathematical programming; multiple criteria decision-making; analytic hierarchy process; fuzzy and interval comparisons;
D O I
10.1016/S0165-0114(02)00383-4
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
A new approach for deriving priorities from fuzzy pairwise comparison judgements is proposed, based on alpha-cuts decomposition of the fuzzy judgements into a series of interval comparisons. The assessment of the priorities from the pairwise comparison intervals is formulated as an optimisation problem, maximising the decision-maker's satisfaction with a specific crisp priority vector. A fuzzy preference programming method, which transforms the interval prioritisation task into a fuzzy linear programming problem is applied to derive optimal crisp priorities. Aggregating the optimal priorities, which correspond to different alpha-cut levels enables overall crisp scores of the prioritisation elements to be obtained. A modification of the linear fuzzy preference programming method is also proposed to derive priorities directly from fuzzy judgements, without applying alpha-cut transformations. The formulation of the prioritisation problem as an optimisation task is similar to the previous approach, but it requires the solution of a non-linear optimisation program. The second approach also derives crisp priorities and has the advantage that it does not need additional aggregation and ranking procedures. Both proposed methods are illustrated by numerical examples and compared to some of the existing fuzzy prioritisation methods. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 385
页数:21
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   APPROXIMATE ARTICULATION OF PREFERENCE AND PRIORITY DERIVATION [J].
ARBEL, A .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1989, 43 (03) :317-326
[2]   Deriving weights from pairwise comparison matrices [J].
Barzilai, J .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 1997, 48 (12) :1226-1232
[3]   On the decomposition of value functions [J].
Barzilai, J .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH LETTERS, 1998, 22 (4-5) :159-170
[4]  
Bellman R. E., 1971, Decision-making in a fuzzy environment, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.17.4.B141
[5]   ON A SHORT-COMING OF SAATY METHOD OF ANALYTIC HIERARCHIES [J].
BELTON, V ;
GEAR, T .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1983, 11 (03) :228-230
[6]   MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS WITH FUZZY PAIRWISE COMPARISONS [J].
BOENDER, CGE ;
DEGRAAN, JG ;
LOOTSMA, FA .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1989, 29 (02) :133-143
[7]   A REVIEW OF SOME METHODS FOR RANKING FUZZY SUBSETS [J].
BORTOLAN, G ;
DEGANI, R .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1985, 15 (01) :1-19
[8]   FUZZY HIERARCHICAL ANALYSIS [J].
BUCKLEY, JJ .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1985, 17 (03) :233-247
[9]   Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP [J].
Chang, DY .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1996, 95 (03) :649-655
[10]   Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparison [J].
Deng, HP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 1999, 21 (03) :215-231