Utility of positron emission tomography for the staging of patients with potentially operable esophageal carcinoma

被引:383
作者
Flamen, P
Lerut, A
Van Cutsem, E
De Wever, W
Peeters, M
Stroobants, S
Dupont, P
Bormans, G
Hiele, M
De Leyn, P
Van Raemdonck, D
Coosemans, W
Ectors, N
Haustermans, K
Mortelmans, L
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Nucl Med, Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Internal Med, Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Radiol, Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[4] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Radiat Oncol, Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[5] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Pathol, Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[6] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Thorac Surg, Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2000.18.18.3202
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: A prospective study of preoperative tumor-node-metastasis staging of patients with esophageal cancer (EC) was designed to compare the accuracy of 18-F-fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) position emission tomography (PET) with conventional noninvasive modalities. Patients and Methods: Seventy-four patients with carcinomas of the esophagus (n = 43) or gastroesophageal junction (n = 31) were studied. All patients underwent attenuation-corrected FDG-PET imaging, a spiral computed tomography (CT) scan, and an endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Results: FDG-PET demonstrated increased activity in the primary tumor in 70 of 74 patients (sensitivity: 95%). False-negative PET images were found in four patients with T1 lesions. Thirty-four patients (46%) had stage IV disease. FDG-PET had a higher accuracy for diagnosing stage IV disease compared with the combination of CT and EUS (82% v 64%, respectively; P = .004). FDG-PET had additional diagnostic value in It. (22%) of 74 patients by upstaging 11 (15%) and downstaging five (7%) patients. Thirty-nine (53%) of the 74 patients underwent a 2- or 3-field lymphadenectomy in conjunction with primary curative esophagectomy. In these patients, tumoral involvement was found in 21 local and 35 regional or distant lymph nodes (LN). For local LN, the sensitivity of FDG-PET was lower than EUS (33% v 81%, respectively; P = .027), but the specificity may have been higher (89% v 67%, respectively; P = not significant [NS]). For the assessment of regional and distant LN involvement, compared with the combined use of CT and EUS, FDG-PET had a higher specificity (90% v 98%, respectively; P = .025) and a similar sensitivity (46% v 43%, respectively; P = NS). Conclusion: PET significantly improver the detection of stage IV disease in EC compared with the conventional staging modalities. PET improves diagnostic specificity for LN staging. (C) 2000 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:3202 / 3210
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] BEAHRS OH, 1998, MANUAL STAGING CANC, P63
  • [2] BECK JR, 1986, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V110, P685
  • [3] Improvement in staging of esophageal cancer with the addition of positron emission tomography
    Block, MI
    Patterson, GA
    Sundaresan, RS
    Bailey, MS
    Flanagan, FL
    Dehdashti, F
    Siegel, BA
    Cooper, JD
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1997, 64 (03) : 770 - 776
  • [4] Bonavina L, 1997, J SURG ONCOL, V65, P171, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9098(199707)65:3<171::AID-JSO5>3.3.CO
  • [5] 2-X
  • [6] PREOPERATIVE STAGING OF ESOPHAGEAL CANCER - COMPARISON OF ENDOSCOPIC US AND DYNAMIC CT
    BOTET, JF
    LIGHTDALE, CJ
    ZAUBER, AG
    GERDES, H
    URMACHER, C
    BRENNAN, MF
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1991, 181 (02) : 419 - 425
  • [7] ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND-GUIDED FINE-NEEDLE ASPIRATION
    CHANG, KJ
    KATZ, KD
    DURBIN, TE
    ERICKSON, RA
    BUTLER, JA
    LIN, F
    WUERKER, RB
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1994, 40 (06) : 694 - 699
  • [8] DAHLBOM M, 1992, J NUCL MED, V33, P1191
  • [9] Staging of esophageal cancer with F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography
    Flanagan, FL
    Dehdashti, F
    Siegel, BA
    Trask, DD
    Sundaresan, SR
    Patterson, GA
    Cooper, DJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 168 (02) : 417 - 424
  • [10] Fukunaga T, 1998, J NUCL MED, V39, P1002