Multiobjective sensitivity analysis of sediment and nitrogen processes with a watershed model

被引:39
作者
Arabi, Mazdak
Govindaraju, Rao S.
Engel, Bernie
Hantush, Mohamed
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Agr & Biol Engn, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Purdue Univ, Sch Civil Engn, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[3] US EPA, Natl Risk Management Res Lab, Cincinnati, OH 45268 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2006WR005463
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
[1] This paper presents a computational analysis for evaluating critical non-point-source sediment and nutrient ( specifically nitrogen) processes and management actions at the watershed scale. In the analysis, model parameters that bear key uncertainties were presumed to reflect the importance of natural processes and/or management actions that they represent. The multiobjective generalized sensitivity analysis and the tree-structured density estimation procedures were used in combination to investigate correlation structure in the parameter space while accounting for multiple objectives. Using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool, this framework was applied to the Dreisbach watershed in Indiana in the Midwestern portion of the United States. Results showed that incorporation of parameter interactions and multiple objectives is essential to obtaining conclusive information about critical system processes and management actions. Interactions between surface runoff volume and within-channel processes were critical to describe transport of sediments in the study watershed. Key management actions for total nitrogen control were found to be nitrogen fertilizer application and upland farming practices. The sensitivity analysis reported herein could be used to derive a list of key non-point-source best management practices for development of watershed management plans. Implications of the analysis that are relevant to calibration of complex watershed models are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1997, AGR HDB
  • [2] Role of watershed subdivision on modeling the effectiveness of best management practices with SWAT
    Arabi, M
    Govindaraju, RS
    Hantush, MM
    Engel, BA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2006, 42 (02): : 513 - 528
  • [3] ARABI M, 2004, EPA600R05080 NATL RI
  • [4] Cost-effective allocation of watershed management practices using a genetic algorithm
    Arabi, Mazdak
    Govindaraju, Rao S.
    Hantush, Mohamed M.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2006, 42 (10)
  • [5] A probabilistic approach for analysis of uncertainty in the evaluation of watershed management practices
    Arabi, Mazdak
    Govindaraju, Rao S.
    Hantush, Mohamed M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2007, 333 (2-4) : 459 - 471
  • [6] Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment - Part 1: Model development
    Arnold, JG
    Srinivasan, R
    Muttiah, RS
    Williams, JR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 1998, 34 (01): : 73 - 89
  • [7] SWAT2000: current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modelling
    Arnold, JG
    Fohrer, N
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2005, 19 (03) : 563 - 572
  • [8] Sensitivity analysis of a land surface scheme using multicriteria methods
    Bastidas, LA
    Gupta, HV
    Sorooshian, S
    Shuttleworth, WJ
    Yang, ZL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1999, 104 (D16) : 19481 - 19490
  • [9] BASTIDAS LA, 1998, THESIS U ARIZ TUCSON
  • [10] Bracmort KS, 2006, T ASABE, V49, P367, DOI 10.13031/2013.20411