A case-series test of the interactive two-step model of lexical access: Predicting word repetition from picture naming

被引:110
作者
Dell, Gary S.
Martin, Nadine
Schwartz, Myrna F.
机构
[1] Albert Einstein Healthcare Network, Moss Rehabil Res Inst, Philadelphia, PA 19141 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[3] Temple Univ, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
关键词
lexical access; aphasia; repetition; picture naming; computational models; SHORT-TERM-MEMORY; SPREADING-ACTIVATION THEORY; DEEP DYSPHASIA; PHONOLOGICAL ERRORS; SEMANTIC BINDING; VERBAL STM; LANGUAGE; APHASIA; CONNECTIONISM; DISSOCIATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jml.2006.05.007
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Lexical access in language production, and particularly pathologies of lexical access, are often investigated by examining errors in picture naming and word repetition. In this article, we test a computational approach to lexical access, the two-step interactive model, by examining whether the model can quantitatively predict the repetition-error patterns of 65 aphasic subjects from their naming errors. The model's characterizations of the subjects' naming errors were taken from the companion paper to this one (Schwartz, M. F., Dell, G. S., Martin, N., Gahl, S., & Sobel, P. (2006). A case-series test of the interactive two-step model of lexical access: evidence from picture naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 228-264), and their repetition was predicted from the model on the assumption that naming involves two error prone steps, word and phonological retrieval, whereas repetition only creates errors in the second of these steps. A version of the model in which lexical-semantic and lexical-phonological connections could be independently lesioned was generally successful in predicting repetition for the aphasics. An analysis of the few cases in which model predictions were inaccurate revealed the role of input phonology in the repetition task. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:490 / 520
页数:31
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]  
ALLPORT A, 1984, COGNITION MOTOR PROC, P209
[2]  
BADDELEY A.D., 1974, PSYCHOL LEARNING MOT, V8
[3]   WORD LENGTH AND STRUCTURE OF SHORT-TERM-MEMORY [J].
BADDELEY, AD ;
THOMSON, N ;
BUCHANAN, M .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1975, 14 (06) :575-589
[4]  
Benson F., 1996, APHASIA CLIN PERSPEC
[5]  
Berndt R.S., 1990, NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL I
[6]  
Berthier M., 1999, TRANSCORTICAL APHASI
[7]  
Box G., 1979, ROBUSTNESS STAT
[8]   FURTHER EVIDENCE OF THE INTRICACY OF MEMORY SPAN [J].
BROOKS, JO ;
WATKINS, MJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1990, 16 (06) :1134-1141
[9]   A CASE-STUDY OF REPRODUCTION CONDUCTION APHASIA .1. WORD PRODUCTION [J].
CAPLAN, D ;
VANIER, M ;
BAKER, C .
COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 3 (01) :99-+
[10]   How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? [J].
Caramazza, A .
COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 14 (01) :177-208