Efficacy and safety of atazanavir-based highly active antiretroviral therapy in patients with virologic suppression switched from a stable, boosted or unboosted protease inhibitor treatment regimen: The SWAN study (AI424-097) 48-week results

被引:119
作者
Gatell, Jose
Salmon-Ceron, Dominique
Lazzarin, Adriano
Van Wijngaerden, Eric
Antunes, Francisco
Leen, Clifford
Horban, Andrzej
Wirtz, Victoria
Odeshoo, Linda
Van den Dungen, Monique
Gruber, Claudia
Ledesma, Emilio
机构
[1] Univ Barcelona, Infect Dis Unit, Hosp Clin, IDIBAPS, E-08036 Barcelona, Spain
[2] Hop Cochin, F-75674 Paris, France
[3] San Raffaele Turro, Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Ziekenhuisen, Louvain, Belgium
[5] Pharmaceut Res Inst, Braine Lalleud, Belgium
[6] Inst Bento Rocha Cabral, Lisbon, Portugal
[7] Univ Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[8] Wojewodzki Hosp, Warsaw, Poland
[9] Bristol Myers Squibb Co, Pharmaceut Res Inst, Wallingford, CT 06492 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1086/517497
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Atazanavir is a once-daily protease inhibitor (PI) for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection that has previously been studied in cohorts of treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients. Limited data are available on the usefulness of switching from a PI-based regimen to a regimen based on a different PI, such as atazanavir, in HIV-infected patients experiencing virologic suppression but seeking regimen simplification. Methods. The Switch to Another Protease Inhibitor (SWAN) study was a 48-week, open-label trial involving HIV-positive patients with virologic suppression who were receiving stable PI-based regimens (with or without ritonavir). Patients were randomized 2: 1 to switch to atazanavir (400 mg per day)-or, if they were receiving tenofovir, to atazanavir-ritonavir (300/100 mg per day) - or to continue to receive their existing PI. The proportion of patients who experienced virologic rebound (defined as an HIV RNA load >= 50 copies/mL) was compared through study week 48. Results. Patients either received an atazanavir-containing regimen (278 patients) or continued to receive a comparator PI-containing regimen (141 patients). The proportion of patients who experienced virologic rebound was significantly lower among those who switched to an atazanavir-containing regimen (19 [7%] of 278) than it was among those who continued to receive a comparator PI regimen (22 [16%] of 141;). Patients who switched to atazanavir therapy experienced significantly fewer total cholesterol, fasting triglyceride, and non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol elevations than did patients in the comparator PI group P <=.001); patients receiving atazanavir had comparable rates of adverse event-related discontinuation and serious adverse events. Conclusions. In patients with virologic suppression who were receiving other PIs, switching to a once- per-day regimen containing atazanavir provided better maintenance of virologic suppression (as demonstrated by significantly lower rates of virologic rebound and treatment failure than those observed with continued unmodified therapy), a comparable safety profile, and improved lipid parameters, compared with those for patients who continued their prior PI- based regimen through 48 weeks.
引用
收藏
页码:1484 / 1492
页数:9
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Barrios A, 2005, ANTIVIR THER, V10, P825
[2]   Adherence to HAART regimens [J].
Chesney, M .
AIDS PATIENT CARE AND STDS, 2003, 17 (04) :169-177
[3]   Executive summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) [J].
Cleeman, JI ;
Grundy, SM ;
Becker, D ;
Clark, LT ;
Cooper, RS ;
Denke, MA ;
Howard, WJ ;
Hunninghake, DB ;
Illingworth, DR ;
Luepker, RV ;
McBride, P ;
McKenney, JM ;
Pasternak, RC ;
Stone, NJ ;
Van Horn, L ;
Brewer, HB ;
Ernst, ND ;
Gordon, D ;
Levy, D ;
Rifkind, B ;
Rossouw, JE ;
Savage, P ;
Haffner, SM ;
Orloff, DG ;
Proschan, MA ;
Schwartz, JS ;
Sempos, CT ;
Shero, ST ;
Murray, EZ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (19) :2486-2497
[4]   Comparison of atazanavir with lopinavir/ritonavir in patients with prior protease inhibitor failure: a randomized multinational trial [J].
Cohen, C ;
Nieto-Cisneros, L ;
Zala, C ;
Fessel, WJ ;
Gonzalez-Garcia, J ;
Gladysz, A ;
McGovern, R ;
Adler, E ;
McLaren, C .
CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2005, 21 (10) :1683-1692
[5]  
GATELL JM, 2006, 16 INT AIDS C 13 18
[6]   Therapy with atazanavir plus saquinavir in patients failing highly active antiretroviral therapy: a randomized comparative pilot trial [J].
Haas, DW ;
Zala, C ;
Schrader, S ;
Piliero, P ;
Jaeger, H ;
Nunes, D ;
Thiry, A ;
Schnittman, S ;
Sension, M .
AIDS, 2003, 17 (09) :1339-1349
[7]   96-week comparison of once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir and twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir in patients with multiple virologic failures [J].
Johnson, M ;
Grinsztejn, B ;
Rodriguez, C ;
Coco, J ;
DeJesus, E ;
Lazzarin, A ;
Lichtenstein, K ;
Wirtz, V ;
Righmire, A ;
Odeshoo, L ;
McLaren, C .
AIDS, 2006, 20 (05) :711-718
[8]  
Möbius U, 2005, JAIDS-J ACQ IMM DEF, V39, P174
[9]   The Assessing Patients' Preferred Treatments (APPT-1) study [J].
Moyle, G .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STD & AIDS, 2003, 14 :34-36
[10]   Dose-ranging, randomized, clinical trial of atazanavir with lamivudine and stavudine in anti retroviral-naive subjects: 48-week results [J].
Murphy, RL ;
Sanne, I ;
Cahn, P ;
Phanuphak, P ;
Percival, L ;
Kelleher, T ;
Giordano, M .
AIDS, 2003, 17 (18) :2603-2614