Quantitative and statistical analysis of differences in sensitivity between Long-Evans and Han/Wistar rats following long-term exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin

被引:8
作者
Sand, Salomon [1 ,2 ]
Fletcher, Nicholas [2 ]
von Rosen, Dietrich [3 ]
Kalantari, Fereshteh [2 ]
Viluksela, Matti [4 ]
Tuomisto, Jouni T. [4 ]
Tuomisto, Jouko [4 ]
Falk-Filipsson, Agneta [5 ]
Hakansson, Helen [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Food Adm Toxicol Lab, SE-75126 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Inst, Inst Environm Med, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Energy & Technol, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
[4] Natl Inst Hlth & Welf, Dept Environm Hlth, FI-70701 Kuopio, Finland
[5] Swedish Chem Inspectorate, SE-17213 Sundbyberg, Sweden
关键词
Strain variation; Strain sensitivity; Benchmark dose; BMD; TCDD; Dose-response; ARYL-HYDROCARBON RECEPTOR; BENCHMARK DOSE ANALYSIS; CONTINUOUS END-POINTS; TRANS-RETINOIC ACID; DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY; ALL-TRANS; RISK-ASSESSMENT; TCDD; METABOLISM; STRAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.01.006
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
In this study, differences in sensitivity between Long-Evans (L-E; dioxin sensitive) and Han/Wistar (H/W; dioxin resistant) rats following long-term exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) were statistically and quantitatively investigated. Sensitivity differences were analyzed by comparing benchmark doses (BMDs) for the two strains considering a number of toxicological endpoints including data on body and organ weights, hepatic foci, hepatic CYP1A1 induction, as well as tissue retinoid levels. Dose-response relationships for L-E and H/W rats, described by the Hill function, were assumed to be parallel, which was supported according to statistical analysis. It was concluded that L-E and H/W rats differed statistically in their response to TCDD treatment for most of the parameters investigated. Differences between the strains were most pronounced for hepatic foci; L-E rats were approximately 20-40 times more sensitive than HAW rats. For body and organ weight parameters, L-E rats were approximately 10-20 times more sensitive than HAW rats. For retinoid parameters and hepatic CYP1A1 induction, estimated differences between the strains were generally about 5-fold, and associated with a low uncertainty. In conclusion, the present study employs a dose-response modeling approach suitable for statistical evaluation of strain and species differences in sensitivity to chemical exposure. The study demonstrates quantitatively the differences in sensitivity between the L-E and H/W rat strains following long-term TCDD exposure. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 145
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Calculation of benchmark doses for reproductive and developmental toxicity observed after exposure to isopropanol [J].
Allen, B ;
Gentry, R ;
Shipp, A ;
Van Landingham, C .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1998, 28 (01) :38-44
[2]   Benchmark dose analysis of developmental toxicity in rats exposed to boric acid [J].
Allen, BC ;
Strong, PL ;
Price, CJ ;
Hubbard, SA ;
Daston, GP .
FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED TOXICOLOGY, 1996, 32 (02) :194-204
[3]  
Andreola F, 1997, CANCER RES, V57, P2835
[4]   Use of the benchmark dose approach in risk assessment Guidance of the Scientific Committee [J].
Barlow, Susan ;
Chesson, Andrew ;
Collins, John D. ;
Flynn, Albert ;
Hardy, Anthony ;
Jany, Klaus-Dieter ;
Knaap, Ada ;
Kuiper, Harry ;
Larsen, John-Christian ;
Lovell, David ;
Le Neindre, Pierre ;
Schans, Jan ;
Schlatter, Josef ;
Silano, Vittorio ;
Skerfving, Staffan ;
Vannier, Philippe .
EFSA JOURNAL, 2009, 7 (06)
[5]   Dose-response characteristics of uterine responses in rats exposed to estrogen agonists [J].
Barton, HA ;
Andersen, ME ;
Allen, BC .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1998, 28 (02) :133-149
[6]  
Chen H, 2000, DRUG METAB DISPOS, V28, P315
[7]   A NEW METHOD FOR DETERMINING ALLOWABLE DAILY INTAKES [J].
CRUMP, KS .
FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED TOXICOLOGY, 1984, 4 (05) :854-871
[8]   Altered retinoid metabolism in female long-evans and Han/Wistar rats following long-term 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD)-treatment [J].
Fletcher, N ;
Giese, N ;
Schmidt, C ;
Stern, N ;
Lind, PM ;
Viluksela, M ;
Tuomisto, JT ;
Tuomisto, J ;
Nau, H ;
Håkansson, H .
TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2005, 86 (02) :264-272
[9]   An evaluation of benchmark dose methodology for non-cancer continuous-data health effects in animals due to exposures to dioxin (TCDD) [J].
Gaylor, DW ;
Aylward, LL .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 40 (01) :9-17
[10]   Effects of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin on bone in two rat strains with different aryl hydrocarbon receptor structures [J].
Jämsä, T ;
Viluksela, M ;
Tuomisto, JT ;
Tuomisto, J ;
Tuukkanen, J .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2001, 16 (10) :1812-1820